Tanaka L L, Dessing J C, Malik P, Prime S L, Crawford J D
Centre for Vision Research and Canadian Action and Perception Network, York University, Toronto, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Diploma Program and Departments of Psychology, Biology, and Kinesiology and Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Centre for Vision Research and Canadian Action and Perception Network, York University, Toronto, Canada; School of Psychology, Queen׳s University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.025. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
Humans typically make several rapid eye movements (saccades) per second. It is thought that visual working memory can retain and spatially integrate three to four objects or features across each saccade but little is known about this neural mechanism. Previously we showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields degrade trans-saccadic memory of multiple object features (Prime, Vesia, & Crawford, 2008, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(27), 6938-6949; Prime, Vesia, & Crawford, 2010, Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 759-772.). Here, we used a similar protocol to investigate whether dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), an area involved in spatial working memory, is also involved in trans-saccadic memory. Subjects were required to report changes in stimulus orientation with (saccade task) or without (fixation task) an eye movement in the intervening memory interval. We applied single-pulse TMS to left and right DLPFC during the memory delay, timed at three intervals to arrive approximately 100 ms before, 100 ms after, or at saccade onset. In the fixation task, left DLPFC TMS produced inconsistent results, whereas right DLPFC TMS disrupted performance at all three intervals (significantly for presaccadic TMS). In contrast, in the saccade task, TMS consistently facilitated performance (significantly for left DLPFC/perisaccadic TMS and right DLPFC/postsaccadic TMS) suggesting a dis-inhibition of trans-saccadic processing. These results are consistent with a neural circuit of trans-saccadic memory that overlaps and interacts with, but is partially separate from the circuit for visual working memory during sustained fixation.
人类通常每秒会进行几次快速眼动(扫视)。据认为,视觉工作记忆能够在每次扫视过程中保留并在空间上整合三到四个物体或特征,但对于这种神经机制我们知之甚少。此前我们发现,对顶叶后部皮质和额叶眼区进行经颅磁刺激(TMS)会损害多个物体特征的跨扫视记忆(Prime、Vesia和Crawford,2008年,《神经科学杂志》,28(27),6938 - 6949;Prime、Vesia和Crawford,2010年,《大脑皮层》,20(4),759 - 772)。在此,我们采用类似的方案来研究背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),这个参与空间工作记忆的区域,是否也参与跨扫视记忆。要求受试者报告在中间记忆间隔期内有(扫视任务)或无(注视任务)眼动时刺激方向的变化。在记忆延迟期间,我们对左右DLPFC施加单脉冲TMS,设置三个时间间隔,分别在扫视开始前约100毫秒、扫视开始后100毫秒或扫视开始时到达。在注视任务中,左侧DLPFC的TMS产生的结果不一致,而右侧DLPFC的TMS在所有三个时间间隔均干扰了表现(对扫视前TMS影响显著)。相比之下,在扫视任务中,TMS始终促进了表现(对左侧DLPFC/扫视时TMS和右侧DLPFC/扫视后TMS影响显著),这表明对跨扫视加工的去抑制作用。这些结果与跨扫视记忆的神经回路一致,该回路与持续注视期间的视觉工作记忆回路重叠并相互作用,但部分是分开的。