Corchia Carlo, Da Frè Monica, Di Lallo Domenico, Gagliardi Luigi, Macagno Franco, Carnielli Virgilio, Miniaci Silvana, Cuttini Marina
ICBD, International Centre on Birth Defects and Prematurity, via Carlo Mirabello 14, 00195 Rome, Italy.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 5;14:307. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-307.
The use of assisted conception (AC) has been associated with higher risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Few data are available on the outcome of AC-neonates when pregnancy ends before 32 weeks of gestational age.The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcome of AC- and naturally conceived preterm infants <32 weeks gestation.
The area-based cohort study ACTION collected data on births 22-31 weeks gestation occurred in 2003-05 in 6 Italian regions. Infants born to 2529 mothers with known mode of conception were studied. The main outcomes were hospital mortality and survival free from major morbidities (IVH grade 3-4, cPVL, ROP stage ≥3, BPD), and were assessed separately for single and multiple infants. Other outcomes were also investigated. Multivariable logistic analyses were used to adjust for maternal and infants' characteristics. To account for the correlation of observations within intensive care units, robust variance and standard error estimates of regression parameters were computed.
AC was used in 6.4% of mothers. Infants were 2934; 314 (10.7%) were born after AC. Multiples were 86.0% among AC and 21.7% among non-AC babies. In multivariable analysis no statistically significant difference in hospital mortality and survival without major morbidities was found between AC and non-AC infants. The risk of BPD was lower in AC than in non-AC multiples (aOR 0.41, CI 0.20-0.87), and this finding did not change after controlling for mechanical ventilation (aOR 0.42, CI 0.20-0.85) or presence of a patent ductus arteriosus (aOR 0.39, CI 0.18-0.84).
When the analysis is restricted to very preterm infants and stratified by multiplicity, no significant associations between AC and increased risk of short-term mortality and survival without major morbidities emerge. This result is consistent with previous studies, and may confirm the hypothesis that the adverse effects of AC are mediated by preterm birth. However, larger appropriately powered studies are needed before definitely excluding the possibility of adverse events linked to AC in infants born before 32 weeks gestation.
辅助生殖技术(AC)的使用与围产期不良结局风险较高相关。关于妊娠在孕32周前结束时AC新生儿的结局,可用数据较少。本研究的目的是比较孕32周前AC和自然受孕的早产儿的短期结局。
基于区域的队列研究ACTION收集了2003 - 2005年意大利6个地区孕22 - 31周出生的数据。对2529名已知受孕方式的母亲所生婴儿进行了研究。主要结局是医院死亡率和无主要疾病(3 - 4级脑室内出血、脑室周围白质软化、视网膜病变≥3期、支气管肺发育不良)存活,分别对单胎和多胎婴儿进行评估。还调查了其他结局。采用多变量逻辑分析来调整母亲和婴儿的特征。为了考虑重症监护病房内观察结果的相关性,计算了回归参数的稳健方差和标准误差估计值。
6.4%的母亲使用了AC。婴儿共2934名;314名(10.7%)为AC后出生。AC婴儿中多胎占86.0%,非AC婴儿中多胎占21.7%。在多变量分析中,AC和非AC婴儿在医院死亡率和无主要疾病存活方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。AC多胎婴儿支气管肺发育不良的风险低于非AC多胎婴儿(调整后比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.20 - 0.87),在控制机械通气(调整后比值比0.42,95%置信区间0.20 - 0.85)或动脉导管未闭情况(调整后比值比0.39,95%置信区间0.18 - 0.84)后,这一发现未改变。
当分析仅限于极早产儿并按多胎情况分层时,AC与短期死亡率增加及无主要疾病存活风险增加之间未出现显著关联。这一结果与先前研究一致,可能证实了AC的不良影响是由早产介导的这一假设。然而,在明确排除孕32周前出生婴儿中与AC相关的不良事件可能性之前,还需要进行规模更大、有足够效力的研究。