Li Qianwen, Li Pengyu, Su Zhuangzhi, Yao Xinyu, Wang Yan, Wang Chen, Du Xiangying, Li Kuncheng
Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Nov;83(11):2024-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
To evaluate the effect of SnapShot Freeze (SSF) reconstruction at an intermediate heart-rate (HR) range (65-75bpm) and compare this method with single-sector reconstruction and bi-sector reconstruction on segmental and vessel bases in retrospective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Retrospective electrocardiogram-gated CCTA was performed on 37 consecutive patients with HR between 65 and 75bpm using a 64-row CT scanner. Retrospective single-sector reconstruction, bi-sector reconstruction, and SSF were performed for each patient. Multi-phase single-sector reconstruction was performed to select the optimal phase. SSF and bi-sector images were also reconstructed at the optimal phase. The images were interpreted in an intent-to-diagnose fashion by two experienced readers using a 5-point scale, with 3 points as diagnostically acceptable. Image quality among the three reconstruction groups were compared on per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment bases.
The average HR of the enrolled patients was 69.4±2.7bpm. A total of 111 vessels and 481 coronary segments were assessed. SSF provided significantly higher interpretability of the coronary segments than bi-sector reconstructions. The qualified and excellent rates of SSF (97.9% and 82.3%) were significantly higher than those of single-sector (92.9% and 66.3%) and bi-sector (90.9% and 64.7%) reconstructions. The image quality score (IQS) using SSF was also significantly higher than those of single-sector and bi-sector reconstructions both on per-patient and per-vessel bases. On per-segment analysis, IQS was improved in most segments (9/14).
The SSF algorithm can provide acceptable diagnostic image quality in coronary CTA for patients with intermediate HR.
评估在中等心率范围(65 - 75次/分钟)下SnapShot Freeze(SSF)重建的效果,并在回顾性冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)中,将该方法与单扇区重建和双扇区重建在节段和血管基础上进行比较。
使用64排CT扫描仪对37例心率在65至75次/分钟之间的连续患者进行回顾性心电图门控CCTA。对每位患者进行回顾性单扇区重建、双扇区重建和SSF。进行多期单扇区重建以选择最佳相位。SSF和双扇区图像也在最佳相位进行重建。由两名经验丰富的阅片者以意向性诊断方式使用5分制对图像进行解读,3分为诊断可接受。在每位患者、每条血管和每个节段的基础上比较三个重建组之间的图像质量。
入选患者的平均心率为69.4±2.7次/分钟。共评估了111条血管和481个冠状动脉节段。与双扇区重建相比,SSF对冠状动脉节段的可解读性显著更高。SSF的合格和优秀率(97.9%和82.3%)显著高于单扇区(92.9%和66.3%)和双扇区(90.9%和64.7%)重建。在每位患者和每条血管的基础上,使用SSF的图像质量评分(IQS)也显著高于单扇区和双扇区重建。在每个节段分析中,大多数节段(9/14)的IQS有所提高。
SSF算法可为中等心率患者的冠状动脉CTA提供可接受的诊断图像质量。