Djernæs Marie, Klass Klaus-Dieter, Eggleton Paul
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Mar;84:284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
Termites (Isoptera) offer an alternative model for the development of eusociality which is not dependent on a high degree of relatedness as found between sisters in hymenopterans (bees, wasps, ants). Recent phylogenetic studies have established that termites belong within the cockroaches as sister to the subsocial Cryptocercidae. Cryptocercidae shares several important traits with termites, thus we need to understand the phylogenetic position of Cryptocercidae+Isoptera to determine how these traits evolved. However, placement of Cryptocercidae+Isoptera is still uncertain. We used both molecular (12S, 16S, COII, 18S, 28S, H3) and morphological characters to reconstruct the phylogeny of Dictyoptera. We included all previously suggested sister groups of Cryptocercidae+Isoptera as well as taxa which might represent additional major cockroach lineages. We used Bayes factors to test different sister groups for Cryptocercidae+Isoptera and assessed character support for the consensus tree based on morphological characters and COII amino acid data. We used the molecular data and fossil calibration to estimate divergence times. We found the most likely sister groups of Cryptocercidae+Isoptera to be Tryonicidae, Anaplecta or Tryonicidae+Anaplecta. Anaplecta has never previously been suggested as sister group or even close to Cryptocercidae+Isoptera, but was formerly placed in Blaberoidea as sister to the remaining taxa. Topological tests firmly supported our new placement of Anaplecta. We discuss the morphological characters (e.g. retractable genitalic hook) that have contributed to the previous placement of Anaplecta in Blaberoidea as well as the factors that might have contributed to a parallel development of genitalic features in Anaplecta and Blaberoidea. Cryptocercidae+Isoptera is placed in a clade with Tryonicidae, Anaplecta and possibly Lamproblattidae. Based on this, we suggest that wood-feeding, and the resultant need to conserve nitrogen, may have been an important factor in the development of termite eusociality. Nocticolidae was placed as sister group to Latindia+Paralatindia (both Corydiidae), this clade was in turn placed as sister group to the remaining Corydiidae. The Nocticolidae+Corydiidae clade is supported by both morphological and COII amino acid changes. Our divergence time estimates placed the split between Mantodea and Blattodea at 273mya (middle Permian) and the splits between the major blattodean lineages no later than 200mya (end of Triassic).
白蚁(等翅目)为真社会性的发展提供了另一种模式,这种模式并不依赖于膜翅目昆虫(蜜蜂、黄蜂、蚂蚁)姐妹之间所具有的高度亲缘关系。最近的系统发育研究表明,白蚁属于蜚蠊目,是亚社会性隐尾蠊科的姐妹群。隐尾蠊科与白蚁具有几个重要特征,因此我们需要了解隐尾蠊科+等翅目的系统发育位置,以确定这些特征是如何进化的。然而,隐尾蠊科+等翅目的位置仍然不确定。我们使用分子特征(12S、16S、COII、18S、28S、H3)和形态特征来重建蜚蠊目的系统发育。我们纳入了所有先前提出的隐尾蠊科+等翅目的姐妹群以及可能代表其他主要蜚蠊谱系的分类单元。我们使用贝叶斯因子来检验隐尾蠊科+等翅目的不同姐妹群,并基于形态特征和COII氨基酸数据评估对共识树的特征支持。我们使用分子数据和化石校准来估计分歧时间。我们发现隐尾蠊科+等翅目最可能的姐妹群是澳蠊科、拟澳蠊科或澳蠊科+拟澳蠊科。以前从未有人提出拟澳蠊科是隐尾蠊科+等翅目的姐妹群,甚至与之接近,但它以前被置于硕蠊总科,是其余分类单元的姐妹群。拓扑检验有力地支持了我们对拟澳蠊科的新定位。我们讨论了导致拟澳蠊科以前被置于硕蠊总科的形态特征(如可伸缩的生殖钩),以及可能导致拟澳蠊科和硕蠊总科生殖特征平行发展的因素。隐尾蠊科+等翅目与澳蠊科、拟澳蠊科以及可能的亮蠊科置于一个分支中。基于此,我们认为以木材为食以及由此产生的对氮的保存需求,可能是白蚁真社会性发展的一个重要因素。夜蠊科被置于拉丁蠊属+副拉丁蠊属(均为地蠊科)的姐妹群位置,这个分支又被置于其余地蠊科的姐妹群位置。夜蠊科+地蠊科分支得到了形态特征和COII氨基酸变化的支持。我们的分歧时间估计表明,螳螂目和蜚蠊目的分化发生在2.73亿年前(中二叠世),主要蜚蠊谱系之间的分化不晚于2亿年前(三叠纪末)。