Centre for Water Management and Reuse, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Nov 15;499:284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.046. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
This paper presents the results of a hydrological investigation of four medium scale green roofs that were set up at the University of South Australia. In this study, the potential of green roofs as a source control device was investigated over a 2 year period using four medium size green roof beds comprised of two growth media types and two media depths. During the term of this study, 226 rainfall events were recorded and these were representative of the Adelaide climate. In general, there were no statistically significant differences between the rainfall and runoff parameters for the intensive and extensive beds except for peak attenuation and peak runoff delay, for which higher values were recorded in the intensive beds. Longer dry periods generally resulted in higher retention coefficients and higher retention was also recorded in warmer seasons. The average retention coefficient for intensive systems (89%) was higher than for extensive systems (74%). It was shown that rainfall depth, intensity, duration and also average dry weather period between events can change the retention performance and runoff volume of the green roofs. Comparison of green and simulated conventional roofs indicated that the former were able to mitigate the peak of runoff and could delay the start of runoff. These characteristics are important for most source control measures. The recorded rainfall and runoff data displayed a non-linear relationship. Also, the results indicated that continuous time series modelling would be a more appropriate technique than using peak rainfall intensity methods for green roof design and simulation.
本论文介绍了在南澳大利亚大学设立的四个中型绿色屋顶的水文调查结果。在这项研究中,使用两种生长介质类型和两种介质深度的四个中型绿色屋顶床,在两年的时间里研究了绿色屋顶作为源头控制装置的潜力。在研究期间,共记录了 226 次降雨事件,这些事件代表了阿德莱德的气候。一般来说,密集型和粗放型床的降雨和径流参数之间没有统计学上的显著差异,除了峰值衰减和峰值径流延迟,密集型床的这些值更高。较长的干燥期通常会导致更高的保持系数,在温暖的季节也会有更高的保持。密集系统的平均保持系数(89%)高于粗放系统(74%)。结果表明,降雨深度、强度、持续时间以及事件之间的平均干燥天气期都可以改变绿色屋顶的保留性能和径流量。绿色屋顶和模拟传统屋顶的比较表明,前者能够减缓径流峰值,并能延迟径流的开始。这些特性对大多数源头控制措施都很重要。记录的降雨和径流数据显示出非线性关系。此外,结果表明,连续时间序列建模将是一种比使用峰值降雨强度方法更适合绿色屋顶设计和模拟的技术。