Gu Min Geun, Kim Tae Nyeun, Song Jay, Nam Yoon Jeong, Lee Jae Young, Park Jun Suk
Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Digestion. 2014;90(2):75-80. doi: 10.1159/000362444. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is traditionally known to occur in critically ill patients and to have a poor prognosis. Although cholecystectomy is usually recommended for treating AAC, nonsurgical management may be a good alternative. The objective of this study was to review the incidence, risk factors, treatment modality, and therapeutic outcomes of AAC compared to acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC).
Data from 69 patients with AAC and 415 patients with ACC between January 2007 and August 2011 were collected. Analysis and comparison of clinicopathological features and therapeutic outcomes between patients with AAC and those with ACC was performed.
The number of patients over 50 years of age was significantly higher in the AAC group compared with the ACC group (92.8 vs. 81.7%, p = 0.023). Cerebrovascular accidents were significantly more frequent in patients with AAC than in those with ACC (15.9 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.016). A higher incidence of gangrenous cholecystitis was observed in the AAC group (31.2 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001). The overall therapeutic outcomes for patients did not differ statistically between the AAC and ACC groups, irrespective of treatment modalities. The recurrence rate after nonsurgical treatment was significantly lower in the AAC group than in the ACC group (2.7 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.005).
The risk of AAC increases in patients with advanced age and cerebrovascular accidents. Incidence of gangrenous cholecystitis was higher in AAC compared to ACC. Nonsurgical treatments such as antibiotics alone or percutaneous cholecystostomy might be effective in selected patients.
传统观点认为,急性非结石性胆囊炎(AAC)多见于危重症患者,预后较差。尽管通常建议行胆囊切除术治疗AAC,但非手术治疗可能是一种不错的选择。本研究的目的是回顾AAC与急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)相比的发病率、危险因素、治疗方式及治疗结果。
收集了2007年1月至2011年8月期间69例AAC患者和415例ACC患者的数据。对AAC患者和ACC患者的临床病理特征及治疗结果进行了分析和比较。
AAC组50岁以上患者的数量显著高于ACC组(92.8%对81.7%,p = 0.023)。AAC患者发生脑血管意外的频率显著高于ACC患者(15.9%对6.7%,p = 0.016)。AAC组坏疽性胆囊炎的发生率更高(31.2%对5.6%,p = 0.001)。无论治疗方式如何,AAC组和ACC组患者的总体治疗结果在统计学上无差异。AAC组非手术治疗后的复发率显著低于ACC组(2.7%对23.2%,p = 0.005)。
高龄和脑血管意外患者发生AAC的风险增加。与ACC相比,AAC中坏疽性胆囊炎的发生率更高。单独使用抗生素或经皮胆囊造瘘术等非手术治疗可能对部分患者有效。