Patel Hiten D, Humphreys Elizabeth, Trock Bruce J, Han Misop, Carter H Ballentine
Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):812-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.101. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
Regional and local variation in radical prostatectomy rates contribute to overtreatment of low risk prostate cancer. We hypothesized that individual practice variability would be minimal among urologists practicing at a high volume academic center.
We assessed the percent of patients at low risk treated with radical prostatectomy in a given year and comorbidity adjusted life expectancy in an institutional database accounting for temporal trends and disease characteristics. Multivariable linear, spline and logistic models were applied with a hierarchical random effects model to estimate the proportion of variance due to surgeon and temporal effects.
Of the 20,655 men included in study 11,873 (57.5%) had low risk disease. The Gleason score leading to radical prostatectomy increased with time. Overall the percent of patients at low risk treated with prostatectomy in a given year increased 3.49% yearly from 1991 to 2001 and then decreased by 1.73% yearly from 2001 to 2013. Greater surgeon experience was associated with a higher percent of patients at low risk treated with prostatectomy in a given year from 1991 to 2001 (0.46% per year of experience). High volume surgeons (total more than 1,000 radical prostatectomies) operated on a slightly greater percent of patients at low risk (3.54%). Substantial practice variation existed among surgeons for operating on men 65 years old or older at low risk (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.62-6.11). There was similar variation when operating on older patients with a life expectancy of less than 15 years. Surgeon level and temporal effects explained 24% and 70%, respectively, of the variance in the percent of patients at low risk treated with radical prostatectomy in a given year.
At a high volume academic center substantial practice variation exists among surgeons when selecting patients with prostate cancer to undergo radical prostatectomy based on risk and life expectancy even among older patients. In addition to patient decision support tools, publicly reporting individual practice patterns at the provider level could decrease the overtreatment of low risk prostate cancer.
根治性前列腺切除术率的地区和局部差异导致低风险前列腺癌的过度治疗。我们假设,在高容量学术中心执业的泌尿科医生中,个体实践差异将最小。
我们在一个机构数据库中评估了给定年份接受根治性前列腺切除术的低风险患者百分比以及合并症调整后的预期寿命,该数据库考虑了时间趋势和疾病特征。应用多变量线性、样条和逻辑模型以及分层随机效应模型来估计由于外科医生和时间效应导致的方差比例。
在纳入研究的20655名男性中,11873名(57.5%)患有低风险疾病。导致根治性前列腺切除术的Gleason评分随时间增加。总体而言,1991年至2001年,给定年份接受前列腺切除术的低风险患者百分比每年增加3.49%,然后在2001年至2013年每年下降1.73%。从1991年到2001年,外科医生经验越丰富,给定年份接受前列腺切除术的低风险患者百分比越高(每年经验增加0.46%)。高容量外科医生(总计超过1000例根治性前列腺切除术)对略高比例的低风险患者进行手术(3.54%)。对于65岁及以上低风险男性患者,外科医生之间存在实质性的手术差异(比值比3.15,95%置信区间1.62 - 6.11)。对于预期寿命小于15年的老年患者进行手术时也存在类似差异。外科医生水平和时间效应分别解释了给定年份接受根治性前列腺切除术的低风险患者百分比方差的24%和70%。
在高容量学术中心,即使在老年患者中,外科医生在根据风险和预期寿命选择前列腺癌患者进行根治性前列腺切除术时也存在实质性的实践差异。除了患者决策支持工具外,在提供者层面公开报告个体实践模式可以减少低风险前列腺癌的过度治疗。