Suppr超能文献

医学实习期间的迷你临床演练评估:学习需求和学习目标是否一致?

The mini-clinical evaluation exercise during medical clerkships: are learning needs and learning goals aligned?

机构信息

Institute of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2014 Oct;48(10):1008-19. doi: 10.1111/medu.12513.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The generation of learning goals (LGs) that are aligned with learning needs (LNs) is one of the main purposes of formative workplace-based assessment. In this study, we aimed to analyse how often trainer-student pairs identified corresponding LNs in mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) encounters and to what degree these LNs aligned with recorded LGs, taking into account the social environment (e.g. clinic size) in which the mini-CEX was conducted.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of adapted mini-CEX forms (trainers' and students' assessments) completed by all Year 4 medical students during clerkships were performed. Learning needs were defined by the lowest score(s) assigned to one or more of the mini-CEX domains. Learning goals were categorised qualitatively according to their correspondence with the six mini-CEX domains (e.g. history taking, professionalism). Following descriptive analyses of LNs and LGs, multi-level logistic regression models were used to predict LGs by identified LNs and social context variables.

RESULTS

A total of 512 trainers and 165 students conducted 1783 mini-CEXs (98% completion rate). Concordantly, trainer-student pairs most often identified LNs in the domains of 'clinical reasoning' (23% of 1167 complete forms), 'organisation/efficiency' (20%) and 'physical examination' (20%). At least one 'defined' LG was noted on 313 student forms (18% of 1710). Of the 446 LGs noted in total, the most frequently noted were 'physical examination' (49%) and 'history taking' (21%). Corresponding LNs as well as social context factors (e.g. clinic size) were found to be predictors of these LGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although trainer-student pairs often agreed in the LNs they identified, many assessments did not result in aligned LGs. The sparseness of LGs, their dependency on social context and their partial non-alignment with students' LNs raise questions about how the full potential of the mini-CEX as not only a 'diagnostic' but also an 'educational' tool can be exploited.

摘要

目的

生成与学习需求(LN)相匹配的学习目标(LG)是形成性基于工作场所评估的主要目的之一。在这项研究中,我们旨在分析在迷你临床评估练习(mini-CEX)中培训师-学生对相关 LN 的识别频率,以及考虑到 mini-CEX 进行的社会环境(例如诊所规模),这些 LN 与记录的 LG 匹配的程度。

方法

对所有四年级医学生在实习期间完成的适应性迷你 CEX 表格(培训师和学生评估)进行回顾性分析。学习需求由一个或多个 mini-CEX 领域分配的最低分数定义。学习目标根据其与 mini-CEX 六个领域的对应关系进行定性分类(例如,病史采集、专业精神)。在对 LN 和 LG 进行描述性分析之后,使用多水平逻辑回归模型根据识别的 LN 和社会环境变量预测 LG。

结果

共有 512 名培训师和 165 名学生进行了 1783 次 mini-CEX(完成率为 98%)。培训师-学生对最常在“临床推理”(1167 份完整表格中的 23%)、“组织/效率”(20%)和“体检”(20%)领域中识别 LN。在 1710 份学生表格中至少记录了一个“定义”LG(占 18%)。总共记录了 446 个 LG,其中最常记录的是“体检”(49%)和“病史采集”(21%)。所识别的 LN 以及社会环境因素(例如诊所规模)被发现是这些 LG 的预测因素。

结论

尽管培训师-学生对他们识别的 LN 经常达成一致,但许多评估并没有产生匹配的 LG。LG 的稀疏性、它们对社会环境的依赖性以及它们与学生 LN 的部分不匹配,引发了人们对如何充分发挥 mini-CEX 不仅作为“诊断”工具,而且作为“教育”工具的潜力的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验