• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受胆囊癌手术患者的淋巴结转移。淋巴结清扫范围及淋巴结比率的预后价值。

Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for a gallbladder cancer. Extension of the lymph node dissection and prognostic value of the lymph node ratio.

作者信息

Birnbaum David Jérémie, Viganò Luca, Russolillo Nadia, Langella Serena, Ferrero Alessandro, Capussotti Lorenzo

机构信息

Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):811-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4044-4. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-4044-4
PMID:25201500
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) status is one of the strongest prognostic factors after gallbladder cancer (GBC) resection. The adequate extension of LN dissection and the stratification of the prognosis in N+ patients have been debated. The present study aims to clarify these issues.

METHODS

A total of 112 consecutive patients who underwent operations for GBC with LN dissection were analyzed. Twenty-five patients (22.3%) had D1 dissection (hepatic pedicle), and 87 (77.7%) had D2 dissection (hepatic pedicle, celiac and retro-pancreatic area). The LN ratio (LNR) was computed as follows: number of metastatic LNs/number of retrieved LNs.

RESULTS

The median number of retrieved LNs was 7 (1-35). Fifty-nine patients (52.7%) had LN metastases (22 N2). D2 dissection allowed the retrieval of more LNs (8 vs. 3, p = 0.0007), with similar short-term outcomes. Common bile duct (CBD) resection (n = 41) did not increase the number of retrieved LNs. In five patients, D2 dissection identified skip LN metastases that otherwise would have been missed. LN metastases negatively impacted survival (5-years survival 57.2% if N0 vs. 12.4% if N+, p < 0.0001), but N1 and N2 patients had similar survival rates. The number of LN+ (1-3 vs. ≥4) did not impact prognosis. An LNR = 0.15 stratified the prognosis of N+ patients: 5-years survival 32.7% if LNR ≤ 0.15 vs. 10.3% if LNR > 0.15 (multivariate analysis p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A D2 LN dissection is recommended in all patients, because it allows for better staging. CBD resection does not improve LN dissection. An LNR = 0.15, not the site of metastatic LNs, stratified the prognoses of N+ patients.

摘要

背景

淋巴结(LN)状态是胆囊癌(GBC)切除术后最强的预后因素之一。淋巴结清扫的适当范围以及N+患者预后的分层一直存在争议。本研究旨在阐明这些问题。

方法

对112例连续接受GBC手术并进行淋巴结清扫的患者进行分析。25例患者(22.3%)行D1清扫(肝蒂),87例(77.7%)行D2清扫(肝蒂、腹腔干和胰后区域)。淋巴结转移率(LNR)计算如下:转移淋巴结数/获取淋巴结数。

结果

获取淋巴结的中位数为7个(1 - 35个)。59例患者(52.7%)有淋巴结转移(22例为N2)。D2清扫能获取更多淋巴结(8个对3个,p = 0.0007),短期结局相似。胆总管(CBD)切除(n = 41)未增加获取淋巴结的数量。在5例患者中,D2清扫发现了跳跃性淋巴结转移,否则这些转移会被漏诊。淋巴结转移对生存有负面影响(N0患者5年生存率为57.2%,N+患者为12.4%,p < 0.0001),但N1和N2患者的生存率相似。阳性淋巴结数量(1 - 3个对≥4个)不影响预后。LNR = 0.15可对N+患者的预后进行分层:LNR≤0.15时5年生存率为32.7%,LNR > 0.15时为10.3%(多因素分析p = 0.007)。

结论

建议对所有患者行D2淋巴结清扫,因为其能更好地进行分期。CBD切除并不能改善淋巴结清扫效果。LNR = 0.15而非转移淋巴结的部位可对N+患者的预后进行分层。

相似文献

1
Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for a gallbladder cancer. Extension of the lymph node dissection and prognostic value of the lymph node ratio.接受胆囊癌手术患者的淋巴结转移。淋巴结清扫范围及淋巴结比率的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):811-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4044-4. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
2
Revisiting the concept of lymph node metastases of pancreatic head cancer: number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio according to N stage.重新审视胰头癌淋巴结转移的概念:根据N分期的转移淋巴结数量及淋巴结比率
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May;21(5):1545-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3473-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
Association of Lymph Node Status With Survival in Patients After Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian Multicenter Analysis.意大利多中心分析:肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后淋巴结状态与生存的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):916-922. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1769.
4
Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and total lymph node count for small bowel adenocarcinoma.淋巴结比率和总淋巴结计数对小肠腺癌的预后相关性
Surgery. 2015 Aug;158(2):486-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.048. Epub 2015 May 23.
5
Optimal assessment of lymph node status in gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌淋巴结状态的最佳评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
6
Surgical approaches to advanced gallbladder cancer : a 40-year single-institution study of prognostic factors and resectability.晚期胆囊癌的手术治疗方法:一项针对预后因素和可切除性的40年单机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4308-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3885-1. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Lymph nodal involvement as prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer: location, count or ratio?淋巴结受累作为胆囊癌的预后因素:位置、数量还是比例?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1528-4. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
8
Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment.根治性切除联合辅助治疗后壶腹腺癌患者淋巴结状态的预后相关性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Limitations of lymph node ratio, evidence-based benchmarks, and the importance of a thorough lymph node dissection in melanoma.淋巴结比率的局限性、循证基准以及在黑色素瘤中彻底淋巴结清扫的重要性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4370-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3186-0. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
10
Lymph-Node Ratio in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma: A Multi-Institution Prognostic Study.皮肤黑色素瘤患者的淋巴结比率:一项多机构预后研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2127-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4132-5. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of nodal staging and risk factors for nodal involvement in gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌淋巴结分期及淋巴结受累危险因素的评估
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf056.
2
Comparable impact of lymph node metastases in T2 gallbladder cancer on postoperative prognosis irrespective of the extent of the metastases: A retrospective analysis.T2期胆囊癌中淋巴结转移对术后预后的类似影响,无论转移范围如何:一项回顾性分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Jun;32(6):443-451. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12140. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
3
Clinical significance of para-aortic lymph node metastasis for prognosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer who underwent radical surgical resections.
接受根治性手术切除的胰胆管癌患者腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移对预后的临床意义。
Turk J Surg. 2025 Feb 27;41(1):5-18. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6587.
4
Long- and short-term outcomes for resectable gallbladder carcinoma patients treated with curative-intent laparoscopic versus open resection: a multicenter propensity score-matched comparative study.接受根治性腹腔镜与开放切除术治疗的可切除胆囊癌患者的长期和短期结局:一项多中心倾向评分匹配的比较研究。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Oct 1;13(5):788-800. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-518. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Lymph node involvement is associated with overall survival for elderly patients with non-metastatic gallbladder adenocarcinoma.淋巴结受累与老年非转移性胆囊腺癌患者的总生存期相关。
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 23;11:1414870. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1414870. eCollection 2024.
6
Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC.胆囊癌的危险因素与预后因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):4201. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144201.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗胆囊癌患者的系统评价和Meta分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Jun 1;13(3):444-459. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-597. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in advanced gallbladder carcinoma with at least 6 lymph nodes retrieved.对于至少检出 6 枚淋巴结的晚期胆囊癌,转移淋巴结比率是一个重要的预后因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 28;408(1):382. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03119-5.
9
Progress in gallbladder cancer with lymph node metastasis.伴有淋巴结转移的胆囊癌的进展
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 22;12:966835. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.966835. eCollection 2022.
10
Optimal Lymph Node Staging System in Evaluating Prognosis of Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Study.评估胆囊癌预后的最优淋巴结分期系统:一项多机构研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8142-8151. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10749-w. Epub 2021 Sep 16.