• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 ExoSeal 血管闭合装置经股动脉正向入路闭合的有效性和止血时间:一项回顾性单中心研究。

Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.006
PMID:25201516
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device (VCD).

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2010 and February 2013, 148 ExoSeal VCD closures (5-7F) of antegrade femoral accesses were performed in 119 patients (70 males, mean age 71.6 years, range 40-97 years). In all cases initial diagnostic angiography was performed via an 18G/3.8F retrograde femoral access, which was left in place during intervention (in-house standard) and was used to obtain control angiography after successful closure of the antegrade access to determine hemostasis. Technical device success was defined as ExoSeal closure without major VCD-related complications; procedural success as hemostasis within 5 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model and correlation analyses.

RESULTS

145/148 (98.0%) ExoSeal closures were technically successful (5F: n = 76; 6F: n = 65; 7F: n = 7). Angiographic control showed closure after 2 minutes in 130/145 cases. In a further 14 cases hemostasis was achieved after an additional 3 minutes MC, so that closure was successful within 5 minutes in 144/148 cases (97.3%). No major complication occurred. One minor complication was recorded in a 6F access case. Pre-interventional activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was the only statistically significant predictor of necessary manual compression (MC) > 2 minutes (p = .01), but with an odds-ratio of only 1.038. The INR showed an odds-ratio of 2.455 for need for 5 minutes MC (NS). Significant correlations were found between the need for 5 minutes MC and medication with acetylsalicylic acid (p = .01), clopidogrel (p < .01), and abciximab (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

ExoSeal vascular closure of antegrade femoral punctures is safe and effective with a low complication rate. Two minutes of MC are sufficient to achieve hemostasis in the majority of cases. However, in patients on antiplatelet therapy, especially after abciximab, the authors advocate prolonging MC to 5 minutes.

摘要

目的

回顾性评估使用 ExoSeal 血管闭合装置(VCD)经顺行股动脉入路进行血管闭合的疗效和止血时间。

设计

回顾性、单中心分析。

材料与方法

2010 年 9 月至 2013 年 2 月,对 119 例患者(70 例男性,平均年龄 71.6 岁,范围 40-97 岁)的 148 例经顺行股动脉入路的 ExoSeal VCD 闭合(5-7F)进行回顾性分析。所有患者均通过 18G/3.8F 逆行股动脉入路进行初始诊断性血管造影,该入路在介入过程中保持在位(内部标准),并在成功闭合顺行入路后用于获得控制血管造影,以确定止血情况。技术设备成功定义为 ExoSeal 闭合无重大 VCD 相关并发症;手术成功定义为 5 分钟内止血。使用逻辑回归模型和相关分析进行统计分析。

结果

148 例 ExoSeal 闭合中,145 例(98.0%)技术上成功(5F:n=76;6F:n=65;7F:n=7)。130/145 例在血管造影控制 2 分钟后显示闭合。在另外 14 例中,在进行了额外的 3 分钟手动压迫(MC)后,止血成功,因此在 144/148 例(97.3%)中,在 5 分钟内成功闭合。无重大并发症发生。在 6F 入路的病例中记录到 1 例小并发症。介入前的部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)是唯一具有统计学意义的需要手动压迫(MC)>2 分钟的预测因子(p=0.01),但比值比仅为 1.038。INR 显示需要 5 分钟 MC 的比值比为 2.455(NS)。需要 5 分钟 MC 与服用乙酰水杨酸(p=0.01)、氯吡格雷(p<0.01)和阿昔单抗(p<0.001)之间存在显著相关性。

结论

使用 ExoSeal 血管闭合装置经顺行股动脉穿刺闭合安全有效,并发症发生率低。大多数情况下,2 分钟的 MC 即可达到止血效果。然而,对于接受抗血小板治疗的患者,特别是在使用阿昔单抗后,作者主张将 MC 延长至 5 分钟。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study.使用 ExoSeal 血管闭合装置经股动脉正向入路闭合的有效性和止血时间:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
2
Retrospective evaluation of safety and effectiveness of the EXOSEAL vascular closure device for single vascular closure and closure after repeat puncture in diagnostic and interventional radiology: single-center experience.回顾性评估 EXOSEAL 血管闭合装置在诊断和介入放射学中单点血管闭合和重复穿刺后闭合的安全性和有效性:单中心经验。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 May;24(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.014.
3
The Use of ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Direct Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Puncture Site Hemostasis.ExoSeal血管闭合装置用于股浅动脉直接顺行穿刺部位止血
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;38(3):560-4. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0984-0. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Factors related to insufficient hemostasis using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device with five-minutes compression for femoral artery punctures after neuro-endovascular therapy: A retrospective, single-center experience.神经介入治疗后使用 EXOSEAL 血管闭合装置行 5 分钟压迫时发生股动脉穿刺部位止血不充分的相关因素:回顾性单中心经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):255-263. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138367. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Patient Satisfaction After Femoral Arterial Access Site Closure Using the ExoSeal(®) Vascular Closure Device Compared to Manual Compression: A Prospective Intra-individual Comparative Study.使用ExoSeal(®)血管闭合装置与手动压迫相比,股动脉穿刺部位闭合后的患者满意度:一项前瞻性个体内比较研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1204-2. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
6
Suitability of Exoseal vascular closure device for antegrade femoral artery puncture site closure.Exoseal 血管闭合装置在前路股动脉穿刺部位闭合中的适用性。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;36(3):659-68. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0501-2. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
7
Incidence of delayed angiographic femoral artery complications using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device.使用EXOSEAL血管闭合装置后延迟性血管造影股动脉并发症的发生率。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Jun;21(3):401-6. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581776. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.一项比较血管闭合装置与手动压迫在诊断性冠状动脉造影术后实现止血效果的随机临床试验的原理与设计:动脉穿刺部位器械封闭 - 闭合装置与手动压迫(ISAR-CLOSURE)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):198-203. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A33.
9
Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.一种新型血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性:ExoSeal与Angio-Seal和ProGlide的前瞻性对比研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Dec;21(6):822-8. doi: 10.1583/14-4744MR.1.
10
Feasibility of vascular access closure in arteries other than the common femoral artery using the ExoSeal vascular closure device.使用 ExoSeal 血管闭合装置经股总动脉以外的动脉行血管入路闭合的可行性。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Oct;37(5):1352-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0853-x. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Balloon-assisted ExoSeal closure for inadvertent subclavian artery cannulation following central venous catheterization: A case report.球囊辅助ExoSeal封堵术治疗中心静脉置管后意外锁骨下动脉插管:一例报告
Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251363121. doi: 10.1177/00368504251363121. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Intravascular ultrasound findings of the protrusion of the EXOSEAL plug that caused acute limb ischemia.导致急性肢体缺血的EXOSEAL封堵器突出的血管内超声表现。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 Dec 20;9(1):101083. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.101083. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Factors related to insufficient hemostasis using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device with five-minutes compression for femoral artery punctures after neuro-endovascular therapy: A retrospective, single-center experience.
神经介入治疗后使用 EXOSEAL 血管闭合装置行 5 分钟压迫时发生股动脉穿刺部位止血不充分的相关因素:回顾性单中心经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):255-263. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138367. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
4
ULSOSEAL Technique: A Unique Technique to Achieve Hemostasis Using ExoSeal in High-Risk Patients after Common Femoral Artery Puncture.ULSOSEAL 技术:一种在普通股动脉穿刺后使用 ExoSeal 在高危患者中实现止血的独特技术。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 28;2021:2470333. doi: 10.1155/2021/2470333. eCollection 2021.
5
Antegrade common femoral artery closure device use is associated with decreased complications.顺行股总动脉闭合装置的使用与并发症减少相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1610-1617.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Access site pseudoaneurysms after endovascular intervention for peripheral arterial diseases.外周动脉疾病血管内介入治疗后穿刺部位假性动脉瘤
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Jun;96(6):305-312. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.96.6.305. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Korean single-center experience with femoral access closure using the ExoSeal device.韩国使用ExoSeal装置进行股动脉穿刺闭合的单中心经验。
World J Radiol. 2018 Sep 28;10(9):108-115. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i9.108.