Szwajca Krzysztof
Psychiatr Pol. 2014 May-Jun;48(3):563-72.
The notion of resilience, which attempts to explain the phenomenon of positive adaptation (coping) of people exposed to adversities or traumatic events, is becoming a significant area of research in Poland. It is a complex and multidimensional notion, on the borderline between genetics, neurophysiology, anthropology of culture, sociology, medicine, political science, developmental psychology and psychiatry. The phenomenon of resilience is interactive (as it combines the experience of trauma with adaptation to it), it is difficult to measure and it raises serious methodological concerns. They tend to be so significant that some researchers consider resilience to be a construct of dubious scientific value. Such a view seems to be overly critical, however it indicates the magnitude of methodological difficulties. This article discusses some of them: problems with definitions and terminology, measurement difficulties associated with the interactive nature of resilience, the need to search for complex interactions between biological, psychological, social and environmental factors (rather than overly simplistic focus on individual factors which support good adaptation). The methodological issues have been divided into the following research areas: the nature of traumatic experiences, response to trauma, factors which impact the reporting of the reaction to trauma, developmental problems.
复原力这一概念试图解释遭受逆境或创伤性事件的人们积极适应(应对)的现象,在波兰正成为一个重要的研究领域。它是一个复杂且多维度的概念,处于遗传学、神经生理学、文化人类学、社会学、医学、政治学、发展心理学和精神病学的交叉边缘。复原力现象具有交互性(因为它将创伤经历与对创伤的适应结合在一起),难以衡量,且引发了严重的方法论问题。这些问题往往非常突出,以至于一些研究人员认为复原力是一个科学价值存疑的概念。然而,这种观点似乎过于苛刻,不过它也指出了方法论困难的程度。本文讨论其中一些问题:定义和术语问题、与复原力交互性质相关的测量困难、寻找生物、心理、社会和环境因素之间复杂相互作用的必要性(而不是过度简单地关注支持良好适应的个体因素)。方法论问题已被分为以下研究领域:创伤经历的性质、对创伤的反应、影响对创伤反应报告的因素、发展问题。