Suppr超能文献

两种开胸术闭合技术的比较:术后疼痛和肺功能。

Comparison between two thoracotomy closure techniques: postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

机构信息

University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Jul-Aug;40(4):389-96. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000400006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare two thoracotomy closure techniques (pericostal and transcostal suture) in terms of postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study carried out in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Luzia de Pinho Melo Hospital das Clínicas and at the University of Mogi das Cruzes, both located in the city of Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil. We included 30 patients (18-75 years of age) undergoing posterolateral or anterolateral thoracotomy. The patients were randomized into two groups by the type of thoracotomy closure: pericostal suture (PS; n = 16) and transcostal suture (TS; n = 14). Pain intensity during the immediate and late postoperative periods was assessed by a visual analogic scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Spirometry variables (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, and PEF) were determined in the preoperative period and on postoperative days 21 and 60.

RESULTS

Pain intensity was significantly greater in the PS group than in the TS group. Between the preoperative and postoperative periods, there were decreases in the spirometry variables studied. Those decreases were significant in the PS group but not in the TS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients in the TS group experienced less immediate and late post-thoracotomy pain than did those in the PS group, as well as showing smaller reductions in the spirometry parameters. Therefore, transcostal suture is recommended over pericostal suture as the thoracotomy closure technique of choice.

摘要

目的

比较两种开胸术闭合技术(肋旁缝合和跨肋缝合)在术后疼痛和肺功能方面的差异。

方法

这是一项在巴西莫吉达斯克鲁兹市的 Luzia de Pinho Melo 医院胸外科和莫吉达斯克鲁兹大学进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。共纳入 30 例(18-75 岁)接受后外侧或前外侧开胸术的患者。患者通过开胸术闭合类型随机分为两组:肋旁缝合组(PS 组,n = 16)和跨肋缝合组(TS 组,n = 14)。采用视觉模拟评分法和 McGill 疼痛问卷评估即刻和晚期术后疼痛强度。术前和术后第 21 天和第 60 天测定肺功能变量(FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC 比值和 PEF)。

结果

PS 组的疼痛强度明显高于 TS 组。与术前相比,所有研究的肺功能变量均有所下降。PS 组的这些下降具有统计学意义,但 TS 组没有。

结论

TS 组患者术后即刻和晚期疼痛明显少于 PS 组,肺功能参数下降幅度也较小。因此,跨肋缝合作为开胸术闭合技术优于肋旁缝合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f30/4201169/0241dc74b276/1806-3713-jbpneu-40-04-00389-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验