Marjoux S, Brochard C, Roman S, Gincul R, Pagenault M, Ponchon T, Ropert A, Mion F
Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, E. Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Department of Digestive Diseases, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(8):735-41. doi: 10.1111/dote.12282. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin in the cardia or distal esophagus have been advocated to treat achalasia and spastic esophageal motility disorders. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether manometric diagnosis using the Chicago classification in high-resolution manometry (HRM) would be predictive of the clinical response. Charts of patients with spastic and hypertensive motility disorders diagnosed with HRM and treated with botulinum toxin were retrospectively reviewed at two centers. HRM recordings were systematically reanalyzed, and a patient's phone survey was conducted. Forty-five patients treated between 2008 and 2013 were included. Most patients had achalasia type 3 (22 cases). Other diagnoses were jackhammer esophagus (8 cases), distal esophageal spasm (7 cases), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (5 cases), nutcracker esophagus (1 case), and 2 unclassified cases. Botulinum toxin injections were performed into the cardia only in 9 cases, into the wall of the distal esophagus in 19 cases, and in both locations (cardia and distal esophagus) in 17 cases. No complication occurred in 31 cases. Chest pain was noticed for less than 7 days in 13 cases. One death related to mediastinitis occurred 3 weeks after botulinum toxin injection. Efficacy was assessed in 42 patients: 71% were significantly improved 2 months after botulinum toxin, and 57% remained satisfied for more than 6 months. No clear difference was observed in terms of response according to manometric diagnosis; however, type 3 achalasia previously dilated and with normal integrated relaxation pressure (4s-integrated relaxation pressure < 15 mmHg) had the worst outcome: none of these patients responded to the endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin. Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin may be effective in some patients with spastic or hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders. The manometric Chicago classification diagnosis does not seem to predict the results. Prospective randomized trials are required to identify patients most likely to benefit from esophageal botulinum toxin treatment.
内镜下在贲门或食管远端注射肉毒杆菌毒素已被推荐用于治疗贲门失弛缓症和痉挛性食管动力障碍。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在高分辨率测压(HRM)中使用芝加哥分类法进行压力测定诊断是否能预测临床反应。在两个中心对经HRM诊断为痉挛性和高血压性动力障碍并接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的患者病历进行了回顾性分析。对HRM记录进行了系统的重新分析,并对患者进行了电话调查。纳入了2008年至2013年间接受治疗的45例患者。大多数患者为3型贲门失弛缓症(22例)。其他诊断包括强力性食管(8例)、食管远端痉挛(7例)、食管胃交界部流出道梗阻(5例)、胡桃夹食管(1例)以及2例未分类病例。仅在9例患者的贲门处注射了肉毒杆菌毒素,19例患者在食管远端壁注射,17例患者在两个部位(贲门和食管远端)均进行了注射。31例患者未发生并发症。13例患者胸痛持续时间少于7天。1例患者在注射肉毒杆菌毒素3周后因纵隔炎死亡。对42例患者的疗效进行了评估:71%的患者在注射肉毒杆菌毒素2个月后有显著改善,57%的患者在6个月以上仍感到满意。根据压力测定诊断,在反应方面未观察到明显差异;然而,先前已扩张且综合松弛压正常(4秒综合松弛压<15 mmHg)的3型贲门失弛缓症患者预后最差:这些患者均未对内镜下注射肉毒杆菌毒素产生反应。内镜下注射肉毒杆菌毒素可能对一些痉挛性或高收缩性食管动力障碍患者有效。压力测定的芝加哥分类诊断似乎无法预测结果。需要进行前瞻性随机试验,以确定最可能从食管肉毒杆菌毒素治疗中获益的患者。