Lunnay Belinda, Borlagdan Joseph, McNaughton Darlene, Ward Paul
Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):99-109. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549031. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
Increasingly, qualitative health researchers might consider using social media to facilitate communication with participants. Ambiguity surrounding the potential risks intrinsic to social media could hinder ethical conduct and discourage use of this innovative method. We used some core principles of traditional human research ethics, that is, respect, integrity, and beneficence, to design our photo elicitation research that explored the social influences of drinking alcohol among 34 underage women in metropolitan South Australia. Facebook aided our communication with participants, including correspondence ranging from recruitment to feeding back results and sharing research data. This article outlines the ethical issues we encountered when using Facebook to interact with participants and provides guidance to researchers planning to incorporate social media as a tool in their qualitative studies. In particular, we raise the issues of privacy and confidentiality as contemporary risks associated with research using social media.
越来越多的定性健康研究人员可能会考虑使用社交媒体来促进与参与者的沟通。围绕社交媒体内在潜在风险的模糊性可能会阻碍道德行为,并阻碍这种创新方法的使用。我们运用了传统人类研究伦理的一些核心原则,即尊重、正直和行善,来设计我们的照片诱导研究,该研究探讨了南澳大利亚州首府地区34名未成年女性饮酒的社会影响。脸书帮助我们与参与者进行沟通,包括从招募到反馈结果以及分享研究数据的通信。本文概述了我们在使用脸书与参与者互动时遇到的伦理问题,并为计划将社交媒体作为定性研究工具的研究人员提供指导。特别是,我们提出了隐私和保密问题,这是与使用社交媒体进行研究相关的当代风险。