• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大安大略省前交叉韧带重建翻修术的流行病学研究

The epidemiology of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ontario, Canada.

作者信息

Leroux Timothy, Wasserstein David, Dwyer Tim, Ogilvie-Harris Darrell J, Marks Paul H, Bach Bernard R, Townley John B, Mahomed Nizar, Chahal Jaskarndip

机构信息

University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Program (Women's College Hospital), Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Program (Women's College Hospital), Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2666-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546514548165. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1177/0363546514548165
PMID:25214531
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the rate of and risk factors for re-revision, reoperation, and readmission after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited.

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of and risk factors for re-revision, reoperation, and readmission after revision ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

METHODS

All patients who underwent first revision ACLR in Ontario, Canada, from January 2004 to December 2010 were identified and followed until December 2012. Exclusions included age <16 years, previous osteotomy, or multiligament knee reconstruction. The main outcome was re-revision ACLR. Secondary outcomes included reoperation (irrigation and debridement [I&D], meniscectomy, manipulation under anesthesia, contralateral ACLR, and total knee arthroplasty) and readmission. Survival to re-revision was determined using the Kaplan-Meier approach. A Cox proportional hazards model or logistic regression were used to determine the influence of patient, surgical, and provider factors on outcomes. A post hoc analysis was performed to determine the influence of the aforementioned factors on postoperative infection risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 827 patients were included (median age, 30 years; 58.8% males). Single-stage revisions comprised 92.9% of cases, and a meniscal procedure (repair or debridement) was performed in 45.3% of cases. The re-revision rate at a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.2 years was 4.4%, and the 5-year survival rate was 95.4%. The rates of I&D, meniscectomy, contralateral ACLR, and readmission were 0.8%, 3.1%, 3.4%, and 4.1%, respectively. Manipulation under anesthesia and total knee arthroplasty were rare. Young age significantly increased contralateral ACLR risk (risk decreased by 5.1% with each year of age >16 years; P = .02) but not re-revision ACLR risk. Low surgeon's annual volume of revision ACLR (<4 revisions/year: odds ratio, 1.2; P = .02) and male sex (odds ratio, 13.3; P = .01) significantly increased overall infection risk; male sex also influenced I&D risk.

CONCLUSION

Re-revision, reoperation, and readmission rates after revision ACLR were low, and the risk for I&D, infection, and contralateral ACLR were influenced by male sex, low surgeon volume, and young age, respectively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study to determine morbidity rates and risk factors after revision ACLR, providing reference data from the general population.

摘要

背景

关于前交叉韧带重建翻修术后再次翻修、再次手术和再次入院的发生率及危险因素的了解有限。

目的

确定前交叉韧带重建翻修术后再次翻修、再次手术和再次入院的发生率及危险因素。

研究设计

描述性流行病学研究。

方法

确定2004年1月至2010年12月在加拿大安大略省接受首次前交叉韧带重建翻修术的所有患者,并随访至2012年12月。排除标准包括年龄<16岁、既往截骨术或多韧带膝关节重建术。主要结局是前交叉韧带重建再次翻修术。次要结局包括再次手术(冲洗和清创、半月板切除术、麻醉下手法操作、对侧前交叉韧带重建和全膝关节置换术)和再次入院。采用Kaplan-Meier方法确定再次翻修的生存率。使用Cox比例风险模型或逻辑回归来确定患者、手术和医疗服务提供者因素对结局的影响。进行事后分析以确定上述因素对术后感染风险的影响。

结果

总体而言,纳入827例患者(中位年龄30岁;58.8%为男性)。单阶段翻修占病例的92.9%,45.3%的病例进行了半月板手术(修复或清创)。平均随访4.8±2.2年时,再次翻修率为4.4%,5年生存率为95.4%。冲洗和清创、半月板切除术、对侧前交叉韧带重建和再次入院的发生率分别为0.8%、3.1%、3.4%和4.1%。麻醉下手法操作和全膝关节置换术很少见。年轻显著增加对侧前交叉韧带重建风险(年龄每增加1岁>16岁,风险降低5.1%;P = 0.02),但不增加前交叉韧带重建再次翻修风险。外科医生每年前交叉韧带重建翻修手术量低(<4次翻修/年:比值比,1.2;P = 0.02)和男性性别(比值比,13.3;P = 0.01)显著增加总体感染风险;男性性别也影响冲洗和清创风险。

结论

前交叉韧带重建翻修术后再次翻修、再次手术和再次入院率较低,冲洗和清创、感染及对侧前交叉韧带重建风险分别受男性性别、外科医生手术量低和年轻的影响。

临床意义

这是第一项确定前交叉韧带重建翻修术后发病率及危险因素的研究,提供了来自普通人群的参考数据。

相似文献

1
The epidemiology of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省前交叉韧带重建翻修术的流行病学研究
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2666-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546514548165. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
Risk factors for recurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population study in Ontario, Canada, with 5-year follow-up.复发性前交叉韧带重建的风险因素:加拿大安大略省的一项 5 年随访人群研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2099-107. doi: 10.1177/0363546513493580. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
3
Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort.前交叉韧带重建翻修术后的后续手术:来自多中心队列的发生率及危险因素
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2068-2076. doi: 10.1177/0363546517707207. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
The risk of knee arthroplasty following cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population-based matched cohort study.前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节置换术的风险:基于人群的匹配队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):2-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00393.
5
Risk factors of subsequent operations after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.初次前交叉韧带重建术后再次手术的风险因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):619-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546513511416. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
6
A matched-cohort population study of reoperation after meniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.半月板修复术联合与不联合前交叉韧带重建术后再次手术的配对队列人群研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):349-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546512471134. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Low meniscus reoperation rates following meniscus repair during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Turkey: an in-depth national analysis of 8-years.土耳其前交叉韧带重建术中半月板修复后的低半月板再手术率:8 年的深入全国分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 17;25(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07662-0.
8
Re-revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Evaluation From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry.前交叉韧带重建术的再修订:来自挪威膝关节韧带登记处的评估。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1695-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.一期与二期翻修前交叉韧带重建后的结果
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1790-1798. doi: 10.1177/0363546517698684. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
No clinical difference in 10-year outcomes between standard and minimal graft debridement techniques in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings: a randomized controlled trial.在使用自体腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的患者中,标准与最小化移植物清创技术在 10 年随访结果中无临床差异:一项随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):516-523. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5146-5. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese expert consensus on failure and revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后失败与翻修的中国专家共识
J Orthop Translat. 2025 May 23;52:451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Anterior cruciate ligament failure and management.前交叉韧带损伤与治疗
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 May 9;8(5):231-244. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0037.
3
Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
前交叉韧带重建术后手术部位感染的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;57(2):118-128. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105448. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Practice Patterns for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in an Integrated Health Care System.综合医疗保健系统中前交叉韧带重建翻修的实践模式
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jul 14;10(7):23259671221106465. doi: 10.1177/23259671221106465. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Controversies in ACL revision surgery: Italian expert group consensus and state of the art.前交叉韧带重建术的争议:意大利专家组共识与技术现状。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jul 15;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00652-9.
6
Correlation of Isokinetic Testing and ACL Failure With the Short Graft Tape Suspension Technique at Six Months.六个月时等速测试及前交叉韧带断裂与短移植物带悬吊技术的相关性
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 6;4(2):e585-e590. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.020. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
[Mid-to-long term clinical outcomes and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament revision].[前交叉韧带翻修术后的中长期临床结果及预测因素]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):857-864. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.008.
8
Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates.前交叉韧带重建术的年手术量较低与较高的翻修率无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 May;30(5):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06655-z. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Supplementary Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis for Residual Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in Patients Undergoing Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.单束前交叉韧带重建患者残余前外侧旋转不稳的补充外侧关节外腱固定术:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 May 7;9(5):23259671211002282. doi: 10.1177/23259671211002282. eCollection 2021 May.
10
Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Frequency With Which Patients Change Surgeons.前交叉韧带重建翻修的危险因素及患者更换外科医生的频率。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Nov 21;7(11):2325967119880487. doi: 10.1177/2325967119880487. eCollection 2019 Nov.