Crook Meredith, Ajdukovic Maya, Angley Christopher, Soulsby Natalie, Doecke Christopher, Stupans Ieva, Angley Manya
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia . Adelaide ( Australia ).
Emergency Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital. Adelaide ( Australia ).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2007;5(2):78-84. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552007000200005.
The Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Committee guidelines call for a detailed medication history to be taken at the first point of admission to hospital. Accurate medication histories are vital in optimising health outcomes and have been shown to reduce mortality rates. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of medication histories taken in the Emergency Department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Medication histories recorded by medical staff were compared to those elicited by a pharmacy researcher. The study, conducted over a six-week period, included 100 patients over the age of 70, who took five or more regular medications, had three or more clinical co-morbidities and/or had been discharged from hospital in three months prior to the study. Following patient interviews, the researcher contacted the patient's pharmacist and GP for confirmation and completion of the medication history. Out of the 1152 medications recorded as being used by the 100 patients, discrepancies were found for 966 medications (83.9%). There were 563 (48.9%) complete omissions of medications. The most common discrepancies were incomplete or omitted dosage and frequency information. Discrepancies were mostly medications that treated dermatological and ear, nose and throat disorders but approximately 29% were used to treat cardiovascular disorders. This study provides support for the presence of an Emergency Department pharmacist who can compile a comprehensive and accurate medication history to enhance medication management along the continuum of care. It is recommended that the patient's community pharmacy and GP be contacted for clarification and confirmation of the medication history.
澳大利亚药物咨询委员会指南要求在患者首次入院时获取详细的用药史。准确的用药史对于优化健康结局至关重要,并且已被证明可降低死亡率。本研究旨在调查阿德莱德皇家医院急诊科获取的用药史的准确性。将医务人员记录的用药史与药剂师研究人员获取的用药史进行比较。该研究为期六周,纳入了100名70岁以上的患者,这些患者服用五种或更多常规药物,有三种或更多临床合并症和/或在研究前三个月内曾出院。在对患者进行访谈后,研究人员联系了患者的药剂师和全科医生以确认并完善用药史。在记录的100名患者使用的1152种药物中,发现966种药物(83.9%)存在差异。有563种药物(48.9%)被完全遗漏。最常见的差异是用药剂量和频率信息不完整或遗漏。差异主要存在于治疗皮肤病以及耳、鼻、喉疾病的药物中,但约29%用于治疗心血管疾病。本研究支持急诊科配备药剂师,其能够编制全面准确的用药史,以加强整个护理过程中的药物管理。建议联系患者的社区药房和全科医生以澄清和确认用药史。