Donmez Kesen Nazmiye, Cakir Aydin, Okutan Murat, Bilge Hatice
Department of Radiotherapy, Istanbul University, Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Radiotherapy, Istanbul University, Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.
Med Dosim. 2015 Spring;40(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
In recent years, small-field electron beams have been used for the treatment of superficial lesions, which requires small circular fields. However, when using very small electron fields, some significant dosimetric problems may occur. In this study, dose distributions and outputs of circular fields with dimensions of 5cm and smaller, for nominal energies of 6, 9, and 15MeV from the Siemens ONCOR Linac, were measured and compared with data from a treatment planning system using the pencil-beam algorithm in electron beam calculations. All dose distribution measurements were performed using the Gafchromic EBT film; these measurements were compared with data that were obtained from the Computerized Medical Systems (CMS) XiO treatment planning system (TPS), using the gamma-index method in the PTW VeriSoft software program. Output measurements were performed using the Gafchromic EBT film, an Advanced Markus ion chamber, and thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD). Although the pencil-beam algorithm is used to model electron beams in many clinics, there is no substantial amount of detailed information in the literature about its use. As the field size decreased, the point of maximum dose moved closer to the surface. Output factors were consistent; differences from the values obtained from the TPS were, at maximum, 42% for 6 and 15MeV and 32% for 9MeV. When the dose distributions from the TPS were compared with the measurements from the Gafchromic EBT films, it was observed that the results were consistent for 2-cm diameter and larger fields, but the outputs for fields of 1-cm diameter and smaller were not consistent. In CMS XiO TPS, calculated using the pencil-beam algorithm, the dose distributions of electron treatment fields that were created with circular cutout of a 1-cm diameter were not appropriate for patient treatment and the pencil-beam algorithm is not convenient for monitor unit (MU) calculations in electron dosimetry.
近年来,小射野电子束已被用于治疗浅表病变,这需要小圆形射野。然而,当使用非常小的电子射野时,可能会出现一些显著的剂量学问题。在本研究中,测量了西门子ONCOR直线加速器标称能量为6、9和15MeV时尺寸为5cm及更小的圆形射野的剂量分布和输出剂量,并与在电子束计算中使用笔形束算法的治疗计划系统的数据进行了比较。所有剂量分布测量均使用Gafchromic EBT胶片进行;这些测量结果与使用PTW VeriSoft软件程序中的伽马指数法从计算机医学系统(CMS)XiO治疗计划系统(TPS)获得的数据进行了比较。输出剂量测量使用Gafchromic EBT胶片、高级马库斯电离室和热释光剂量测定法(TLD)。尽管许多临床机构使用笔形束算法对电子束进行建模,但文献中关于其使用的详细信息并不多。随着射野尺寸减小,最大剂量点向表面移动。输出因子是一致的;与TPS获得的值的差异,对于6和15MeV最大为42%,对于9MeV为32%。当将TPS的剂量分布与Gafchromic EBT胶片的测量结果进行比较时,发现对于直径2cm及更大的射野结果是一致的,但对于直径1cm及更小的射野输出剂量不一致。在使用笔形束算法计算的CMS XiO TPS中,直径1cm的圆形限束器产生的电子治疗射野的剂量分布不适合患者治疗,并且笔形束算法在电子剂量测定的监测单位(MU)计算中不方便使用。