Luc Brittney, Gribble Phillip A, Pietrosimone Brian G
Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;
J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):806-19. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.35.
To determine the prophylactic capability of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in decreasing the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) when compared with ACL-deficient patients, as well as the effect of a concomitant meniscectomy. We also sought to examine the influence of study design, publication date, and graft type as well as the magnitude of change in physical activity from preinjury Tegner scores in both cohorts.
We searched Web of Science and PubMed databases from 1960 through 2012 with the search terms osteoarthritis, meniscectomy, anterior cruciate ligament, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and anterior cruciate ligament deficient.
Articles that reported the prevalence of tibiofemoral or patellofemoral OA based on radiographic assessment were included. We calculated numbers needed to treat and relative risk reduction with associated 95% confidence intervals for 3 groups (1) patients with meniscal and ACL injury, (2) patients with isolated ACL injury, and (3) total patients (groups 1 and 2).
A total of 38 studies met the criteria. Of these, 27 assessed the presence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in patients treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Overall, ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) yielded a numbers needed to treat to harm of 16 with a relative risk increase of 16%. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction along with meniscectomy yielded a numbers needed to treat to benefit of 15 and relative risk reduction of 11%. Isolated ACL-R showed a numbers needed to treat to harm of 8 and relative risk increase of 43%. Activity levels were decreased in both ACL-R (d = -0.90; 95% confidence interval = 0.77, 1.13) and ACL-deficient (d = -1.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.96, 1.29) patients after injury.
The current literature does not provide substantial evidence to suggest that ACL-R is an adequate intervention to prevent knee osteoarthritis. With regard to osteoarthritis prevalence, the only patients benefiting from ACL-R were those undergoing concomitant meniscectomy with reconstruction.
与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者相比,确定ACL重建在降低膝关节骨关节炎(OA)风险方面的预防能力,以及同期半月板切除术的影响。我们还试图研究研究设计、发表日期、移植物类型的影响,以及两组患者从损伤前Tegner评分开始身体活动变化的幅度。
我们检索了1960年至2012年的Web of Science和PubMed数据库,检索词为骨关节炎、半月板切除术、前交叉韧带、前交叉韧带重建和前交叉韧带损伤。
纳入基于影像学评估报告胫股或髌股OA患病率的文章。我们计算了3组患者(1)半月板和ACL损伤患者、(2)孤立ACL损伤患者、(3)所有患者(第1组和第2组)的治疗所需人数和相对风险降低率,并给出相关的95%置信区间。
共有38项研究符合标准。其中,27项评估了接受前交叉韧带重建治疗患者的胫股骨关节炎情况。
总体而言,ACL重建(ACL-R)导致伤害的治疗所需人数为16,相对风险增加16%。前交叉韧带重建联合半月板切除术的受益治疗所需人数为15,相对风险降低11%。孤立的ACL-R导致伤害的治疗所需人数为8,相对风险增加43%。损伤后,ACL-R患者(d=-0.90;95%置信区间=±0.77,±1.13)和ACL损伤患者(d=-1.13;95%置信区间=±0.96,±1.29)的活动水平均下降。
目前的文献没有提供充分证据表明ACL-R是预防膝关节骨关节炎的适当干预措施。就骨关节炎患病率而言,唯一从ACL-R中受益的患者是那些同期进行半月板切除术并重建的患者。