Saman Masoud, Kadakia Sameep, Ducic Yadranko
Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas.
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, Mount Sinai Health System, New York.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):410-3. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543.
Patients are placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to restore premorbid occlusion prior to open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures. Maintaining MMF for these patients for several weeks postoperatively is a widely accepted dictum.
We compare postoperative ORIF outcomes in dentate patients with noncomminuted symphyseal, parasymphyseal, or angle fractures of the mandible between those who underwent postoperative MMF and those who did not.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of medical records for 311 patients with 413 mandibular fractures treated at a level 1 public trauma center in the Fort Worth, Texas, metropolitan area. All patients were treated from August 1997 to August 2012 and had a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks.
Of the 413 symphyseal, parasymphyseal, and angle fractures, 78, 63, and 83 patients were treated with postoperative MMF respectively. The group without postoperative MMF included 56 symphyseal fractures, 49 parasymphyseal fractures, and 84 angle fractures.
Rates of wound dehiscence, infection, plate removal, nonunion, malunion, and malocclusion were compared.
Using an unpaired t test and α value of .05 for significance, the difference between the 2 groups' outcomes was not statistically significant for any of the complications evaluated. In the groups with vs without postoperative MMF, the mean numbers of complications were as follows: wound dehiscence, 4.7 vs 2.5 (95% CI, -1.7 to 6.0) (P = .16); infection, 6.7 vs 4.0 (95% CI, -1.7 to 7.0) (P = .14); plate removal, 2.3 vs 2.5 (95% CI, -7.9 to 7.6) (P = .94); nonunion, 1.0 vs 0.5 (95% CI, -2.2 to 3.2) (P = .59); malunion, 0.7 vs 1.0 (95% CI, -3.1 to 2.4) (P = .72); and malocclusion, 1.3 vs 1.0 (95% CI, -4.0 to 4.7) (P = .82).
The surgical dictum of maintaining postoperative MMF for all trauma patients after ORIF of the mandible may not be of advantage in the treatment of dentate patients with noncomminuted symphyseal, parasymphyseal, or angle fractures.
在下颌骨骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)之前,患者需进行颌间固定(MMF)以恢复病前咬合关系。术后让这些患者维持数周的颌间固定是一条被广泛接受的原则。
我们比较了接受术后颌间固定和未接受术后颌间固定的有牙患者下颌骨非粉碎性正中联合、下颌骨旁正中或下颌角骨折的术后切开复位内固定术(ORIF)结果。
设计、地点和参与者:对德克萨斯州沃思堡市一个一级公共创伤中心治疗的311例患者的413处下颌骨骨折病历进行回顾性研究。所有患者于1997年8月至2012年8月接受治疗,且至少随访6周。
在413处正中联合、下颌骨旁正中及下颌角骨折中,分别有78例、63例和83例患者接受了术后颌间固定。未接受术后颌间固定的组包括56处正中联合骨折、49处下颌骨旁正中骨折和84处下颌角骨折。
比较伤口裂开、感染、取出钢板、骨不连、骨畸形愈合和咬合不正的发生率。
使用不成对t检验和α值为0.05作为显著性标准,两组在任何评估的并发症方面的结局差异均无统计学意义。在接受与未接受术后颌间固定的组中,并发症的平均数量如下:伤口裂开,4.7对2.5(95%CI,-1.7至6.0)(P = 0.16);感染,6.7对4.0(95%CI,-1.7至7.0)(P = 0.14);取出钢板,2.3对2.5(95%CI,-7.9至7.6)(P = 0.94);骨不连,1.0对0.5(95%CI,-2.2至3.2)(P = 0.59);骨畸形愈合,0.7对1.0(95%CI,-3.1至2.4)(P = 0.72);咬合不正,1.3对1.0(95%CI,-4.0至4.7)(P = 0.82)。
对于下颌骨切开复位内固定术后的所有创伤患者维持术后颌间固定的手术原则,在治疗有牙的下颌骨非粉碎性正中联合、下颌骨旁正中或下颌角骨折患者时可能并无益处。