Desloge Joseph G, Reed Charlotte M, Braida Louis D, Perez Zachary D, Delhorne Lorraine A, Villabona Timothy J
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Feb;135(2):838-50. doi: 10.1121/1.4861246.
Temporal processing ability for the senses of hearing and touch was examined through the measurement of gap-duration discrimination thresholds (GDDTs) employing the same low-frequency sinusoidal stimuli in both modalities. GDDTs were measured in three groups of observers (normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and normal-hearing with simulated hearing loss) covering an age range of 21-69 yr. GDDTs for a baseline gap of 6 ms were measured for four different combinations of 100-ms leading and trailing markers (250-250, 250-400, 400-250, and 400-400 Hz). Auditory measurements were obtained for monaural presentation over headphones and tactile measurements were obtained using sinusoidal vibrations presented to the left middle finger. The auditory GDDTs of the hearing-impaired listeners, which were larger than those of the normal-hearing observers, were well-reproduced in the listeners with simulated loss. The magnitude of the GDDT was generally independent of modality and showed effects of age in both modalities. The use of different-frequency compared to same-frequency markers led to a greater deterioration in auditory GDDTs compared to tactile GDDTs and may reflect differences in bandwidth properties between the two sensory systems.
通过测量间隙持续时间辨别阈值(GDDTs)来检测听觉和触觉的时间处理能力,在两种模态中均采用相同的低频正弦刺激。在年龄范围为21 - 69岁的三组观察者(听力正常、听力受损以及模拟听力损失的听力正常者)中测量GDDTs。针对100毫秒前导和尾随标记的四种不同组合(250 - 250、250 - 400、400 - 250和400 - 400赫兹),测量了6毫秒基线间隙的GDDTs。通过耳机进行单耳呈现获得听觉测量结果,使用施加于左手食指的正弦振动获得触觉测量结果。听力受损听众的听觉GDDTs大于听力正常观察者的,在模拟听力损失的听众中得到了很好的再现。GDDT的大小通常与模态无关,并且在两种模态中均显示出年龄效应。与相同频率标记相比,使用不同频率标记导致听觉GDDTs比触觉GDDTs恶化更严重,这可能反映了两个感觉系统之间带宽特性的差异。