• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物性肝损伤报告中的年龄相关差异:世界卫生组织安全报告数据库的数据挖掘

Age-related differences in reporting of drug-associated liver injury: data-mining of WHO Safety Report Database.

作者信息

Hunt Christine M, Yuen Nancy A, Stirnadel-Farrant Heide A, Suzuki Ayako

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.007
PMID:25236535
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Age-differences in the frequency and manifestations of drug-induced liver injury are not fully characterized. Data-mining analyses were performed to assess the impact of age on liver event reporting frequency with different phenotypes and agents.

METHODS

236 drugs associated with hepatotoxicity were evaluated using the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) of the relative reporting ratio with 90% confidence interval (EB05 and EB95) calculated for the age groups: 0-17, 18-64, and⩾65years (or elderly), for overall, serious (acute liver failure), hepatocellular, and cholestatic liver injury, using the WHO Safety Report Database.

RESULTS

Overall, cases of age 0-17, 18-64, and 65years or older comprised 6%, 62%, and 32% of liver event reports. Acute liver failure and hepatocellular injury were more frequently reported among children compared to adults and the elderly while reports with cholestatic injury were more frequent among the elderly (p<0.00001). A potential to cause mitochondrial dysfunction was more prevalent among the drugs with increased pediatric reporting frequency while high lipophilicity and biliary excretion were more common among the drugs associated with higher reporting frequency in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

Age-specific phenotypes and potential drug properties associated with age-specific hepatotoxicity were identified in reported liver events; further analyses are warranted.

摘要

背景/目的:药物性肝损伤的频率和表现的年龄差异尚未完全明确。进行数据挖掘分析以评估年龄对不同表型和药物的肝脏事件报告频率的影响。

方法

使用世界卫生组织安全报告数据库,对236种与肝毒性相关的药物进行评估,计算0 - 17岁、18 - 64岁和≥65岁(或老年人)年龄组的相对报告率的经验贝叶斯几何均值(EBGM)及其90%置信区间(EB05和EB95),用于总体、严重(急性肝衰竭)、肝细胞性和胆汁淤积性肝损伤。

结果

总体而言,0 - 17岁、18 - 64岁和65岁及以上的病例分别占肝脏事件报告的6%、62%和32%。与成人和老年人相比,儿童急性肝衰竭和肝细胞损伤的报告更为频繁,而胆汁淤积性损伤的报告在老年人中更为频繁(p<0.00001)。在儿科报告频率增加的药物中,导致线粒体功能障碍的可能性更为普遍,而在老年人报告频率较高的药物中,高亲脂性和胆汁排泄更为常见。

结论

在报告的肝脏事件中确定了与年龄特异性肝毒性相关的年龄特异性表型和潜在药物特性;有必要进行进一步分析。

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in reporting of drug-associated liver injury: data-mining of WHO Safety Report Database.药物性肝损伤报告中的年龄相关差异:世界卫生组织安全报告数据库的数据挖掘
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
Data mining for prospective early detection of safety signals in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): a case study of febrile seizures after a 2010-2011 seasonal influenza virus vaccine.利用数据挖掘技术对疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)中的安全信号进行前瞻性早期检测:2010-2011 年季节性流感病毒疫苗接种后发热性惊厥的病例研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Jul;36(7):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0051-9.
3
Dissimilar hepatotoxicity profiles of propylthiouracil and methimazole in children.丙硫氧嘧啶和甲巯咪唑在儿童中的肝毒性谱不同。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jul;95(7):3260-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2546. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
4
Triptans and serious adverse vascular events: data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.曲坦类药物与严重不良血管事件:FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库的数据挖掘。
Cephalalgia. 2014 Jan;34(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/0333102413499649. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Interplay of gender, age and drug properties on reporting frequency of drug-induced liver injury.性别、年龄和药物特性对药物性肝损伤报告频率的相互影响。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;94:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Comedications alter drug-induced liver injury reporting frequency: Data mining in the WHO VigiBase™.合并用药改变药物性肝损伤报告频率:世界卫生组织药物不良反应数据库(WHO VigiBase™)中的数据挖掘
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Drugs associated with hepatotoxicity and their reporting frequency of liver adverse events in VigiBase: unified list based on international collaborative work.与肝毒性相关的药物及其在 VigiBase 中报告的肝脏不良事件频率:基于国际合作工作的统一列表。
Drug Saf. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):503-22. doi: 10.2165/11535340-000000000-00000.
8
Signal detection of potentially drug-induced acute liver injury in children using a multi-country healthcare database network.利用多国医疗保健数据库网络对儿童潜在药物性急性肝损伤进行信号检测。
Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;37(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0132-9.
9
Profiling cumulative proportional reporting ratios of drug-induced liver injury in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.在 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库中分析药物性肝损伤的累积比例报告比值。
Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;36(12):1169-78. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0116-9.
10
Drug induced hepatotoxicity: data from the Serbian pharmacovigilance database.药物性肝毒性:来自塞尔维亚药物警戒数据库的数据。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):416-23. doi: 10.1002/pds.2115. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Comparing hepatocellular and cholestatic patterns of drug-induced liver injury.系统评价与荟萃分析:比较药物性肝损伤的肝细胞型和胆汁淤积型
ILIVER. 2023 May 25;2(2):122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Influence of patient age and sex on drug-induced liver injury caused by antiseizure medications: a disproportionality analysis of VigiBase.患者年龄和性别对抗癫痫药物所致药物性肝损伤的影响:VigiBase数据库的不成比例分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01935-x.
3
Prediction of adverse drug reactions using demographic and non-clinical drug characteristics in FAERS data.
利用 FAERS 数据中的人口统计学和非临床药物特征预测药物不良反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74505-2.
4
Insights from pharmacovigilance and pharmacodynamics on cardiovascular safety signals of NSAIDs.药物警戒与药效学对非甾体抗炎药心血管安全信号的见解。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1455212. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1455212. eCollection 2024.
5
Liver injury associated with endothelin receptor antagonists: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system data.与内皮素受体拮抗剂相关的肝损伤:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据的药物警戒研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1307-1316. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01757-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
Age-related differences in drug-induced liver injury: a retrospective single-center study from a large liver disease specialty hospital in China, 2002-2022.年龄相关的药物性肝损伤差异:2002-2022 年中国一家大型肝病专科医院的回顾性单中心研究。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Aug;18(4):1202-1213. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10679-1. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Clinical and biochemical characteristics, and outcome in 33 patients with ceftriaxone-induced liver injury.33例头孢曲松所致肝损伤患者的临床和生化特征及预后
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;80(9):1317-1324. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03701-w. Epub 2024 May 29.
8
Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Elderly: Consensus Statements and Recommendations from the IQ-DILI Initiative.老年人药物性肝损伤:IQ-DILI 倡议的共识声明和建议。
Drug Saf. 2024 Apr;47(4):301-319. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01390-5. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
9
Autoimmunity associates with severity of illness in elderly patients with drug-induced liver injury.自身免疫与老年药物性肝损伤患者的疾病严重程度相关。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1071709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1071709. eCollection 2023.
10
Evaluation of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.新型冠状病毒肺炎住院患者药物性肝损伤的评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 17;10(10):2045. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102045.