Rahimzadeh Poupak, Faiz Seyed Hamid Reza, Alebouyeh Mahmood Reza, Dasian Azadeh, Sayarifard Azadeh
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rasoul-Akram Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
Preventive and Community Medicine specialist, Community Based Participatory Research Center, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jul;16(7):e16388. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16388. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Emergence Agitation (EA) is a common problem in pediatric anesthesia. The current study evaluated the effect of intravenous lidocaine combined with propofol or thiopental sodium to control EA by sevoflurane in children.
The current study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two anesthesia regimen propofol-lidocaine and thiopental sodium lidocaine to control sevoflurane-induced emergence agitation in children.
The study enrolled 120 children aged 12 to 36 months with retinoblastoma who underwent induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane for Eye Examination Under Anesthesia (EUA). Sampling was done at Rasoul-Akram Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The subjects were randomly assigned into four groups including: group one (thiopental sodium-lidocaine [TL]), group two (thiopental sodium-saline [TS]), group three (propofol-lidocaine [PL]), and group four (propofol-saline [PS]). Emergence agitation was assessed by using a five-point scoring scale, every 10 minutes during the first 30 minutes after admission to the recovery room.
EA occurred in 24 cases (20%) of children. Incidence of EA in the TS, TL, PS, and PL groups were 21 (70%), 2 (6.7%), 1 (3.3%), and 0 (0%), respectively (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting after anesthesia did not occur in any of the patients. After removal of the endotracheal tube, laryngospasm complication occurrence in the TS group (10 cases) was higher than the other groups and no statistically significant difference was observed (P = 0.1).
Propofol-lidocaine anesthesia regimen was more effective to control the pediatric emergence agitation than the other combinations.
苏醒期躁动(EA)是小儿麻醉中的常见问题。本研究评估静脉注射利多卡因联合丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠对七氟醚诱导小儿苏醒期躁动的控制效果。
本研究旨在比较丙泊酚 - 利多卡因和硫喷妥钠 - 利多卡因两种麻醉方案对控制小儿七氟醚诱导的苏醒期躁动的有效性。
本研究纳入120例年龄在12至36个月的视网膜母细胞瘤患儿,这些患儿在全身麻醉下接受眼科检查(EUA)并使用七氟醚诱导麻醉。研究在伊朗德黑兰的拉苏勒 - 阿克拉姆医院进行。受试者被随机分为四组,包括:第一组(硫喷妥钠 - 利多卡因 [TL])、第二组(硫喷妥钠 - 生理盐水 [TS])、第三组(丙泊酚 - 利多卡因 [PL])和第四组(丙泊酚 - 生理盐水 [PS])。在进入恢复室后的前30分钟内,每隔10分钟使用五点评分量表评估苏醒期躁动情况。
24例(20%)患儿发生了苏醒期躁动。TS、TL、PS和PL组的苏醒期躁动发生率分别为21例(70%)、2例(6.7%)、1例(3.3%)和0例(0%)(P < 0.001)。所有患者术后均未发生恶心和呕吐。拔除气管导管后,TS组(10例)喉痉挛并发症的发生率高于其他组,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.1)。
丙泊酚 - 利多卡因麻醉方案在控制小儿苏醒期躁动方面比其他组合更有效。