Unroe Kathleen T, Cagle John G, Dennis M E, Lane Kathleen A, Callahan Christopher M, Miller Susan C
Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN; Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
University of Maryland-Baltimore School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):881-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
Use of hospice has been associated with improved outcomes for nursing home residents and attitudes of nursing home staff toward hospice influences hospice referral. The objective of this study is to describe attitudes of certified nursing assistants (CNAs), nurses, and social workers toward hospice care in nursing homes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a survey of 1859 staff from 52 Indiana nursing homes.
Study data include responses to 6 scaled questions and 3 open-ended qualitative prompts. In addition, respondents who cared for a resident on hospice in the nursing home were asked how often hospice: (1) makes their job easier; (2) is responsive when a patient has symptoms or is actively dying; (3) makes care coordination smooth; (4) is needed; (5) taught them something; and (6) is appreciated by patients/families. Responses were dichotomized as always/often or sometimes/never.
A total of 1229 surveys met criteria for inclusion. Of the respondents, 48% were CNAs, 49% were nurses, and 3% were social workers; 83% reported caring for a nursing home patient on hospice. The statement with the highest proportion of always/often rating was 'patient/family appreciate added care' (84%); the lowest was 'hospice makes my job easier' (54%). More social workers responded favorably regarding hospice responsiveness and coordination of care compared with CNAs (P = .03 and P = .05, respectively).
A majority of staff responded favorably regarding hospice care in nursing homes. About one-third of nursing home staff rated coordination of care lower than other aspects, and many qualitative comments highlighted examples of when hospice was not responsive to patient needs, representing important opportunities for improvement.
临终关怀的使用与疗养院居民的预后改善相关,且疗养院工作人员对临终关怀的态度会影响临终关怀转诊。本研究的目的是描述注册护理助理(CNA)、护士和社会工作者对疗养院临终关怀护理的态度。
设计、设置和参与者:我们对印第安纳州52家疗养院的1859名工作人员进行了调查。
研究数据包括对6个量表问题和3个开放式定性问题的回答。此外,询问了在疗养院照顾临终关怀患者的受访者,临终关怀多久:(1)使他们的工作更轻松;(2)在患者出现症状或濒死时做出响应;(3)使护理协调顺利;(4)有必要;(5)教会他们一些东西;(6)得到患者/家属的赞赏。回答被分为总是/经常或有时/从不。
共有1229份调查问卷符合纳入标准。在受访者中,48%是CNA,49%是护士,3%是社会工作者;83%报告在疗养院照顾临终关怀患者。总是/经常评分比例最高的陈述是“患者/家属感激额外的护理”(84%);最低的是“临终关怀使我的工作更轻松”(54%)。与CNA相比,更多社会工作者对临终关怀的响应性和护理协调给予了积极评价(分别为P = 0.03和P = 0.05)。
大多数工作人员对疗养院的临终关怀护理给予了积极评价。约三分之一的疗养院工作人员对护理协调的评分低于其他方面,许多定性评论突出了临终关怀未响应患者需求的例子,这是重要的改进机会。