Panikker Sandeep, Virmani Renu, Sakakura Kenichi, Kolodgie Frank, Francis Darrel P, Markides Vias, Walcott Greg, McElderry H Tom, Wong Tom
Heart Rhythm Centre, NIHR Cardiovascular Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
CV Path, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jan;12(1):202-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) electrical isolation is reported to improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. However, loss of mechanical function may increase thromboembolic risk.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LAA occlusion after electrical isolation in a canine model.
Nine canines underwent LAA isolation with irrigated radiofrequency ablation after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Entrance and exit block were confirmed with intravenous adenosine after 30 minutes. The LAA was then occluded with a Watchman device. Device position was assessed at 10 days by using transthoracic echocardiography. At 45 days, LAA isolation was assessed epicardially. Hearts were then examined macroscopically and histologically.
All 36 PVs and 8 of 9 LAAs (89%) were electrically isolated. Acute LAA reconnection occurred in 4 of 8 LAAs (50%). All were reisolated. The mean ablation time was 51 ± 19 minutes, including 24 ± 18 minutes for LAA isolation. LAA occlusion was successful in all cases. One animal died of a primary intracranial bleed due to anticoagulant hypersensitivity 36 hours after the procedure. Transthoracic echocardiography at 10 days confirmed satisfactory device positions and no pericardial effusion. At 45 days, 7 of 8 (88%) had persistent LAA electrical isolation. All devices were stable without evidence of erosion. Microscopy revealed complete device-tissue apposition and a mature connective tissue layer overlying the device surface in all cases.
LAA electrical isolation and mechanical occlusion can be performed concomitantly in this animal model, with no displacement or mechanical erosion of the appendage at 45 days. This technique can potentially improve success rates and obviate the need for chronic anticoagulation. Future studies should address efficacy, safety, and feasibility in humans.
据报道,左心耳(LAA)电隔离可改善房颤消融效果。然而,机械功能丧失可能会增加血栓栓塞风险。
本研究旨在评估犬模型中电隔离后LAA封堵的可行性和安全性。
9只犬在肺静脉(PV)隔离后接受了经灌注射频消融的LAA隔离。30分钟后静脉注射腺苷确认入口和出口阻滞。然后用Watchman装置封堵LAA。10天时通过经胸超声心动图评估装置位置。45天时,在心外膜评估LAA隔离情况。然后对心脏进行宏观和组织学检查。
所有36条PV和9个LAA中的8个(89%)实现了电隔离。8个LAA中有4个(50%)发生急性LAA重新连接。所有均重新隔离。平均消融时间为51±19分钟,其中LAA隔离时间为24±18分钟。所有病例LAA封堵均成功。1只动物在术后36小时因抗凝过敏死于原发性颅内出血。10天时经胸超声心动图确认装置位置满意且无心包积液。45天时,8个中有7个(88%)LAA持续电隔离。所有装置均稳定,无侵蚀迹象。显微镜检查显示所有病例中装置与组织完全贴合,装置表面覆盖有成熟的结缔组织层。
在该动物模型中可同时进行LAA电隔离和机械封堵,45天时附属器无移位或机械侵蚀。该技术可能提高成功率并避免长期抗凝的需要。未来研究应探讨其在人体中的有效性、安全性和可行性。