Suppr超能文献

促进中心静脉导管相关血流感染的预防:一项比较感染控制专业人员和一线工作人员观点的定性研究

Facilitating central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention: a qualitative study comparing perspectives of infection control professionals and frontline staff.

作者信息

McAlearney Ann Scheck, Hefner Jennifer L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2014 Oct;42(10 Suppl):S216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.04.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection control professionals (ICPs) play a critical role in implementing and managing healthcare-associated infection reduction interventions, whereas frontline staff are responsible for delivering direct and ongoing patient care. The objective of our study was to determine if ICPs and frontline staff have different perspectives about the facilitators and challenges of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention program success.

METHODS

We conducted key informant interviews at 8 hospitals that participated in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality CLABSI prevention initiative called "On the CUSP: Stop BSI." We analyzed interview data from 50 frontline nurses and 26 ICPs to identify common themes related to program facilitators and challenges.

RESULTS

We identified 4 facilitators of CLABSI program success: education, leadership, data, and consistency. We also identified 3 common challenges: lack of resources, competing priorities, and physician resistance. However, the perspective of ICPs and frontline nurses differed. Whereas ICPs tended to focus on general descriptions, frontline staff noted program specifics and often discussed concrete examples.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that ICPs need to take into account the perspectives of staff nurses when implementing infection control and broader quality improvement initiatives. Further, the deliberate inclusion of frontline staff in the implementation of these programs may be critical to program success.

摘要

背景

感染控制专业人员(ICPs)在实施和管理降低医疗相关感染的干预措施中发挥着关键作用,而一线工作人员负责提供直接且持续的患者护理。我们研究的目的是确定ICPs和一线工作人员对于中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)预防项目成功的促进因素和挑战是否有不同的看法。

方法

我们在8家参与医疗保健研究与质量局CLABSI预防倡议“处于关键节点:阻止BSI”的医院进行了关键信息人访谈。我们分析了来自50名一线护士和26名ICPs的访谈数据,以确定与项目促进因素和挑战相关的共同主题。

结果

我们确定了CLABSI项目成功的4个促进因素:教育、领导力、数据和一致性。我们还确定了3个常见挑战:资源缺乏、相互竞争的优先事项和医生的抵触。然而,ICPs和一线护士的看法有所不同。ICPs倾向于关注总体描述,而一线工作人员则指出项目细节并经常讨论具体例子。

结论

我们的结果表明,ICPs在实施感染控制和更广泛的质量改进举措时需要考虑护士的观点。此外,在这些项目的实施过程中有意识地纳入一线工作人员可能对项目成功至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验