a Department of Psychology , Roosevelt University , Chicago , IL 60605 , USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(7):1197-208. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.960454. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
While prior research has shown symptom validity tests (SVTs) to have clinical utility with cognitively impaired individuals, these studies typically excluded those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of an SVT, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), in those with MCI and moderate to severe dementia. Participants included 30 cognitively intact individuals (Control Group), 28 diagnosed with MCI (MCI Group), and 31 diagnosed with moderate to severe dementia (Moderate-Severe Group). The range of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Standard Scores were then calculated for each group and all participants were administered the TOMM. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no significant differences on TOMM Trail 2 scores between the Control Group and the MCI Group. While all group means were above established cut-off scores, approximately 20% of participants in the Moderate-Severe Group failed the TOMM according to established criteria. Results suggest that the TOMM may be an appropriate test of effort in older adults diagnosed with MCI, but is not recommended for assessing potential malingering in those with at least moderate to severe dementia.
虽然先前的研究表明症状有效性测试(SVTs)在认知障碍个体中具有临床效用,但这些研究通常排除了轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症患者。本研究旨在确定认知完好的 30 名个体(对照组)、28 名被诊断为 MCI(MCI 组)和 31 名被诊断为中度至重度痴呆(中重度组)的个体中,SVT 测试即记忆伪装测试(TOMM)的效用。重复神经心理状态评估电池(RBANS)的总标准分数范围然后计算每个组和所有参与者进行 TOMM。协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,对照组和 MCI 组在 TOMM 轨迹 2 分数上没有显著差异。虽然所有组的平均值都高于既定的临界值,但根据既定标准,中重度组约 20%的参与者未能通过 TOMM。结果表明,TOMM 可能是对被诊断为 MCI 的老年人进行努力测试的合适方法,但不建议用于评估至少中度至重度痴呆患者的潜在伪装。