Latimer Kevin, Curran William, Benton Christopher P
School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
Previous research has shown that prior adaptation to a spatially circumscribed, oscillating grating results in the duration of a subsequent stimulus briefly presented within the adapted region being underestimated. There is an on-going debate about where in the motion processing pathway the adaptation underlying this distortion of sub-second duration perception occurs. One position is that the LGN and, perhaps, early cortical processing areas are likely sites for the adaptation; an alternative suggestion is that visual area MT+ contains the neural mechanisms for sub-second timing; and a third position proposes that the effect is driven by adaptation at multiple levels of the motion processing pathway. A related issue is in what frame of reference - retinotopic or spatiotopic - does adaptation induced duration distortion occur. We addressed these questions by having participants adapt to a unidirectional random dot kinematogram (RDK), and then measuring perceived duration of a 600 ms test RDK positioned in either the same retinotopic or the same spatiotopic location as the adaptor. We found that, when it did occur, duration distortion of the test stimulus was direction contingent; that is it occurred when the adaptor and test stimuli drifted in the same direction, but not when they drifted in opposite directions. Furthermore the duration compression was evident primarily under retinotopic viewing conditions, with little evidence of duration distortion under spatiotopic viewing conditions. Our results support previous research implicating cortical mechanisms in the duration encoding of sub-second visual events, and reveal that these mechanisms encode duration within a retinotopic frame of reference.
先前的研究表明,预先适应空间受限的振荡光栅会导致在适应区域内短暂呈现的后续刺激的持续时间被低估。关于在运动处理通路的哪个位置发生这种亚秒级持续时间感知失真背后的适应,目前仍在进行争论。一种观点认为,外侧膝状体以及可能的早期皮层处理区域可能是适应的位点;另一种观点认为,视觉区域MT+包含亚秒级计时的神经机制;还有第三种观点认为,这种效应是由运动处理通路多个层面的适应驱动的。一个相关问题是,适应引起的持续时间失真发生在哪个参照系中——视网膜拓扑或空间拓扑。我们通过让参与者适应单向随机点运动图(RDK),然后测量位于与适应刺激相同的视网膜拓扑或相同的空间拓扑位置的600毫秒测试RDK的感知持续时间,来解决这些问题。我们发现,当测试刺激的持续时间失真确实发生时,它是方向依赖的;也就是说,当适应刺激和测试刺激向相同方向漂移时会发生,但当它们向相反方向漂移时则不会。此外,持续时间压缩主要在视网膜拓扑观察条件下明显,在空间拓扑观察条件下几乎没有持续时间失真的证据。我们的结果支持先前的研究,即皮层机制参与亚秒级视觉事件的持续时间编码,并揭示这些机制在视网膜拓扑参照系中编码持续时间。