Gipson Tanjala T, Gerner Gwendolyn, Wilson Mary Ann, Blue Mary E, Johnston Michael V
Tanjala T Gipson, Gwendolyn Gerner, Michael V Johnston, Tuberous Sclerosis Clinic, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2013 Aug 8;2(3):16-25. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v2.i3.16.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two mechanism-based treatments for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-everolimus and vigabatrin. However, these treatments have not been systematically studied in individuals with TSC and severe autism. The aim of this review is to identify the clinical features of severe autism in TSC, applicable preclinical models, and potential barriers that may warrant strategic planning in the design phase of clinical trial development. A comprehensive search strategy was formed and searched across PubMed, Embase and SCOPUS from their inception to 2/21/12, 3/16/12, and 3/12/12 respectively. After the final search date, relevant, updated articles were selected from PubMed abstracts generated electronically and emailed daily from PubMed. The references of selected articles were searched, and relevant articles were selected. A search of clinicaltrials.gov was completed using the search term "TSC" and "tuberous sclerosis complex". Autism has been reported in as many as 60% of individuals with TSC; however, review of the literature revealed few data to support clear classification of the severity of autism in TSC. Variability was identified in the diagnostic approach, assessment of cognition, and functional outcome among the reviewed studies and case reports. Objective outcome measures were not used in many early studies; however, diffusion tensor imaging of white matter, neurophysiologic variability in infantile spasms, and cortical tuber subcategories were examined in recent studies and may be useful for objective classification of TSC in future studies. Mechanism-based treatments for TSC are currently available. However, this literature review revealed two potential barriers to successful design and implementation of clinical trials in individuals with severe autism-an unclear definition of the population and lack of validated outcome measures. Recent studies of objective outcome measures in TSC and further study of applicable preclinical models present an opportunity to overcome these barriers.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已批准两种基于机制的结节性硬化症(TSC)治疗药物——依维莫司和氨己烯酸。然而,这些治疗方法尚未在患有TSC和重度自闭症的个体中进行系统研究。本综述的目的是确定TSC中重度自闭症的临床特征、适用的临床前模型,以及在临床试验开发设计阶段可能需要进行战略规划的潜在障碍。我们制定了全面的检索策略,并分别在PubMed、Embase和SCOPUS数据库中从其创建到2012年2月21日、2012年3月16日和2012年3月12日进行检索。在最终检索日期之后,从PubMed每天以电子方式生成并通过电子邮件发送的摘要中选择相关的最新文章。对所选文章的参考文献进行检索,并选择相关文章。使用检索词“TSC”和“结节性硬化症”在clinicaltrials.gov上进行了检索。据报道,多达60%的TSC患者患有自闭症;然而,文献综述显示,几乎没有数据支持对TSC中自闭症严重程度进行明确分类。在所审查的研究和病例报告中,诊断方法、认知评估和功能结局存在差异。许多早期研究未使用客观结局指标;然而,最近的研究对白质进行了扩散张量成像、对婴儿痉挛的神经生理变异性以及皮质结节亚类进行了检查,这些可能对未来研究中TSC的客观分类有用。目前已有基于机制的TSC治疗方法。然而,这篇文献综述揭示了在重度自闭症个体中成功设计和实施临床试验的两个潜在障碍——人群定义不明确和缺乏经过验证的结局指标。最近对TSC客观结局指标的研究以及对适用临床前模型的进一步研究为克服这些障碍提供了机会。