Suppr超能文献

镜像书疗法治疗特发性面神经麻痹

Mirror book therapy for the treatment of idiopathic facial palsy.

作者信息

Barth Jodi Maron, Stezar Gincy L, Acierno Gabriela C, Kim Thomas J, Reilly Michael J

机构信息

National Rehabilitation Hospital, Regional Rehab at Montrose, Rockville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2014 Sep;93(9):E11-4.

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective chart review to determine the effectiveness of treating idiopathic facial palsy with mirror book therapy in conjunction with facial physical rehabilitation. We compared outcomes in 15 patients who underwent mirror book therapy in addition to standard therapy with those of 10 patients who underwent standard rehabilitation therapy without the mirror book. Before and after treatment, patients in both groups were rated according to the Facial Grading System (FGS), the Facial Disability Index-Physical (FDIP), and the Facial Disability Index-Social (FDIS). Patients in the mirror therapy group had a mean increase of 24.9 in FGS score, 22.0 in FDIP score, and 25.0 in FDIS score, all of which represented statistically significant improvements over their pretreatment scores. Those who did not receive mirror book therapy had mean increases of 20.8, 19.0, 14.6, respectively; these, too, represented significant improvements over baseline, and thus there was no statistically significant difference in improvement between the two groups. Nevertheless, our results show that patients who used mirror book therapy in addition to standard facial rehabilitation therapy experienced significant improvements in the treatment of idiopathic facial palsy. While further studies are necessary to determine if it has a definitive, statistically significant advantage over standard therapy, we recommend adding this therapy to the rehabilitation program in view of its ease of use, low cost, and lack of side effects.

摘要

我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以确定镜像书疗法结合面部物理康复治疗特发性面神经麻痹的有效性。我们将15例在接受标准治疗的基础上还接受了镜像书疗法的患者的治疗结果,与10例仅接受标准康复治疗而未使用镜像书疗法的患者的结果进行了比较。在治疗前后,两组患者均根据面部分级系统(FGS)、面部残疾指数-身体(FDIP)和面部残疾指数-社交(FDIS)进行评分。镜像疗法组患者的FGS评分平均提高了24.9分,FDIP评分提高了22.0分,FDIS评分提高了25.0分,所有这些与治疗前评分相比均有统计学意义的改善。未接受镜像书疗法的患者FGS、FDIP、FDIS评分的平均提高分别为20.8分、19.0分、14.6分;这些与基线相比也有显著改善,因此两组之间的改善在统计学上没有显著差异。尽管如此,我们的结果表明,在标准面部康复治疗的基础上使用镜像书疗法的患者在特发性面神经麻痹的治疗中取得了显著改善。虽然需要进一步研究以确定其是否比标准疗法具有明确的统计学显著优势,但鉴于其使用方便、成本低且无副作用,我们建议将这种疗法添加到康复方案中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验