Weaver Tyler B, Glinka Michal N, Laing Andrew C
Injury Biomechanics and Aging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Injury Biomechanics and Aging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
J Biomech. 2014 Nov 7;47(14):3574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
Currently, it is unknown whether the inverted pendulum model is applicable to stooping or crouching postures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the degree of applicability of the inverted pendulum model to these postures, via examination of the relationship between the centre of mass (COM) acceleration and centre of pressure (COP)-COM difference.
Ten young adults held static standing, stooping and crouching postures, each for 20s. For both the anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) directions, the time-varying COM acceleration and the COP-COM were computed, and the relationship between these two variables was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Additionally, in both directions, the average absolute COM acceleration, average absolute COP-COM signal, and the inertial component (i.e., -I/Wh) were compared across postures.
Pearson correlation coefficients revealed a significant negative relationship between the COM acceleration and COP-COM signal for all comparisons, regardless of the direction (p<0.001). While no effect of posture was observed in the AP direction (p=0.463), in the ML direction, the correlation coefficients for stooping were different (i.e., stronger) than standing (p=0.008). Regardless of direction, the average absolute COM acceleration for both the stooping and crouching postures was greater than standing (p<0.002).
The high correlations indicate that the inverted pendulum model is applicable to stooping and crouching postures. Due to their importance in completing activities of daily living, there is merit in determining what type of motor strategies are used to control such postures and whether these strategies change with age.
目前,尚不清楚倒立摆模型是否适用于弯腰或蹲姿。因此,本研究的目的是通过检查质心(COM)加速度与压力中心(COP)-COM差值之间的关系,来确定倒立摆模型对这些姿势的适用程度。
10名年轻成年人分别保持静态站立、弯腰和蹲姿,每种姿势持续20秒。对于前后(AP)和左右(ML)方向,计算随时间变化的COM加速度和COP-COM,并使用皮尔逊相关系数确定这两个变量之间的关系。此外,在两个方向上,比较不同姿势下的平均绝对COM加速度、平均绝对COP-COM信号和惯性分量(即-I/Wh)。
皮尔逊相关系数显示,在所有比较中,无论方向如何,COM加速度与COP-COM信号之间均存在显著负相关(p<0.001)。在AP方向上未观察到姿势的影响(p=0.463),而在ML方向上,弯腰姿势的相关系数与站立姿势不同(即更强)(p=0.008)。无论方向如何,弯腰和蹲姿的平均绝对COM加速度均大于站立姿势(p<0.002)。
高度相关性表明倒立摆模型适用于弯腰和蹲姿。由于这些姿势在完成日常生活活动中很重要,确定用于控制此类姿势的运动策略类型以及这些策略是否随年龄变化具有重要意义。