Blomfield Rebecca L, Collins Clare E, Hutchesson Melinda J, Young Myles D, Jensen Megan E, Callister Robin, Morgan Philip J
Orange Base Hospital, 1502 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; School of Health Sciences,Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
School of Health Sciences,Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;8(5):e476-87. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
Obese men are more likely to have poor dietary patterns compared to women, increasing diet-related chronic disease risk. The impact of a male-only weight loss intervention on dietary intakes is under-evaluated. The aim was to determine whether overweight/obese men randomised to self-help paper-based resources with or without online support, achieved greater improvements in diet compared with Wait-list controls at 3 and 6 months following a gender tailored weight-loss intervention.
Dietary intake was assessed using a 120-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), in a secondary analysis of a three-arm weight loss RCT grounded in Social Cognitive Theory; (1) RESOURCES: gender-tailored weight loss resources (DVD, handbooks, pedometer, tape measure); (2) Online: resources plus website and efeedback, (3) Wait-list control.
Energy, total fat, saturated fat, and carbohydrate intakes decreased in the online group, which differed significantly from controls at 3- and 6-month follow-up (P<0.05). There was a significant reduction in energy, fat and carbohydrate intakes in the Resource group at 3 and 6 months, but no difference from controls (P>0.05). In the online group there was an increase in %energy from core foods and decrease in %energy from energy-dense nutrient-poor foods (P<0.05) that was significantly different compared to controls at 3 and 6 months (P<0.05).
Results suggest that men randomised to the SHED-IT intervention arms were able to implement key dietary messages up to 6 months compared to controls. Future interventions should include targeted and gender-tailored messages as a strategy to improve men's dietary intake within weight loss interventions.
与女性相比,肥胖男性的饮食模式更差,增加了与饮食相关的慢性病风险。仅针对男性的减肥干预对饮食摄入量的影响尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是确定在进行针对性别定制的减肥干预后3个月和6个月时,随机分配到接受或不接受在线支持的基于纸质自助资源的超重/肥胖男性,与等待名单对照组相比,在饮食方面是否有更大改善。
在一项基于社会认知理论的三臂减肥随机对照试验的二次分析中,使用120项半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估饮食摄入量;(1)资源组:针对性别定制的减肥资源(DVD、手册、计步器、卷尺);(2)在线组:资源加上网站和电子反馈;(3)等待名单对照组。
在线组的能量、总脂肪、饱和脂肪和碳水化合物摄入量下降,在3个月和6个月的随访中与对照组有显著差异(P<0.05)。资源组在3个月和6个月时能量、脂肪和碳水化合物摄入量显著降低,但与对照组无差异(P>0.05)。在线组中,核心食物提供的能量百分比增加,能量密集型营养缺乏食物提供的能量百分比降低(P<0.05),在3个月和6个月时与对照组相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。
结果表明,与对照组相比,随机分配到SHED-IT干预组的男性在长达6个月的时间里能够实施关键的饮食建议。未来的干预措施应包括有针对性的、针对性别定制的信息,作为在减肥干预中改善男性饮食摄入量的一种策略。