Boisson Matthieu, Jacobs Matthieu, Grégoire Nicolas, Gobin Patrice, Marchand Sandrine, Couet William, Mimoz Olivier
CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France.
INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7331-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03510-14. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Colistin is an old antibiotic that has recently gained a considerable renewal of interest for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nebulization seems to be a promising form of administration, but colistin is administered as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS); however, differences between the intrapulmonary concentrations of the active moiety as a function of the route of administration in critically ill patients have not been precisely documented. In this study, CMS and colistin concentrations were measured on two separate occasions within the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of critically ill patients (n = 12) who had received 2 million international units (MIU) of CMS by aerosol delivery and then intravenous administration. The pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a population approach and completed by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulations. The ELF colistin concentrations varied considerably (9.53 to 1,137 mg/liter), but they were much higher than those in plasma (0.15 to 0.73 mg/liter) after aerosol delivery but not after intravenous administration of CMS. Following CMS aerosol delivery, typically, 9% of the CMS dose reached the ELF, and only 1.4% was presystemically converted into colistin. PK-PD analysis concluded that there was much higher antimicrobial efficacy after CMS aerosol delivery than after intravenous administration. These new data seem to support the use of aerosol delivery of CMS for the treatment of pulmonary infections in critical care patients.
黏菌素是一种古老的抗生素,由于其对多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌所致肺部感染的治疗作用,近年来重新引起了人们的广泛关注。雾化吸入似乎是一种很有前景的给药方式,但黏菌素是以无活性的前体药物黏菌素甲磺酸盐(CMS)的形式给药;然而,在重症患者中,活性成分的肺内浓度随给药途径的不同而产生的差异尚未得到确切记录。在本研究中,对12例接受200万国际单位(MIU)CMS雾化吸入后再静脉给药的重症患者,在两个不同时间点分别测定其血浆和上皮衬液(ELF)中的CMS和黏菌素浓度。采用群体方法进行药代动力学分析,并通过药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)建模和模拟加以完善。雾化吸入CMS后,ELF中的黏菌素浓度差异很大(9.53至1137毫克/升),但远高于血浆中的浓度(0.15至0.73毫克/升),而静脉注射CMS后则不然。CMS雾化吸入后,通常有9%的CMS剂量到达ELF,只有1.4%在体循环前转化为黏菌素。PK-PD分析得出结论,CMS雾化吸入后的抗菌效果远高于静脉给药。这些新数据似乎支持在重症监护患者中使用CMS雾化吸入来治疗肺部感染。