Suppr超能文献

高危T1期结肠癌的标准结肠切除术与有限结肠切除术:一项配对病例对照研究。

Standard versus limited colon resection for high risk T1 colon cancer. A matched case-control study.

作者信息

La Torre Marco, Nigri Giuseppe, Mazzuca Federica, Ferri Mario, Botticelli Andrea, Lorenzon Laura, Pilozzi Emanuela, Ziparo Vincenzo

机构信息

Surgical Department of Clinical Sciences, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;23(3):285-90. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.233.mlt.

Abstract

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends a colectomy in presence of high risk T1 colon polyps considering the risk of incomplete lymph node dissection or presence of residual disease. We evaluated the outcomes of segmental versus standard colon resection for high risk T1 colon cancers, in order to demonstrate if segmental colectomy (SegCR) allows same short-term and oncological results compared to standard radical colectomy (StaCR). METHODS. A matched case-control study on patients who had undergone segmental versus standard colon resection was performed. One-hundred and two patients with high risk T1 colon cancer after endoscopic polypectomy, divided in 2 homogeneous groups of 51 cases, were analyzed and intra-operative, post-operative and oncological data were compared. RESULTS. Segmental colectomy allowed less operative time and intra-operative blood loss compared to StaCR (p < 0.001). Hospital stay after SegCR was shorter compared to StaCR (p < 0.001). No differences were found in terms of overall morbidity and mortality rates. Five-year actuarial overall, disease-free and disease-specific survival after StaCR were similar to SegCR (87%, 96% and 95% vs. 88%, 97% and 94%, respectively, p = 0.51, p=0.33, p=0.78). CONCLUSIONS. According to our findings, SegCR can be a valid alternative to StaCR for high risk T1 colon polyps. Segmental colectomy allows better peri-operative outcomes compared to StaCR ensuring the same oncological long-term outcomes.

摘要

鉴于存在淋巴结清扫不彻底或残留疾病的风险,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)建议对高危T1期结肠息肉进行结肠切除术。我们评估了高危T1期结肠癌节段性切除与标准结肠切除的效果,以证明节段性结肠切除术(SegCR)与标准根治性结肠切除术(StaCR)相比是否能获得相同的短期和肿瘤学结果。方法。对接受节段性与标准结肠切除术的患者进行了一项配对病例对照研究。分析了102例内镜下息肉切除术后的高危T1期结肠癌患者,分为两组,每组51例,比较术中、术后和肿瘤学数据。结果。与StaCR相比,节段性结肠切除术的手术时间和术中失血量更少(p < 0.001)。与StaCR相比,SegCR后的住院时间更短(p < 0.001)。在总体发病率和死亡率方面未发现差异。StaCR术后5年的总生存率、无病生存率和疾病特异性生存率与SegCR相似(分别为87%、96%和95%,vs. 88%、97%和94%,p = 0.51,p = 0.33,p = 0.78)。结论。根据我们的研究结果,对于高危T1期结肠息肉,SegCR可以是StaCR的有效替代方案。与StaCR相比,节段性结肠切除术能带来更好的围手术期结果,同时确保相同的肿瘤学长期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验