Ahmadi Farrokhlagha, Rahmani Fatemeh, Lessan-Pezeshki Mahbob, Azmandian Jalal
Department of Nephrology, Imam Khomeni Hospital, Nephrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran .
Ren Fail. 2015 Feb;37(1):50-6. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.964146. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Residual renal function (RRF) plays a key role in the follow-up of the patients undergoing chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Available methods for measurement of RRF are cumbersome and rarely used, and alternatively, cystatin C-derived equations have been proposed.
Seventy-six adult CAPD patients were recruited. RRF was measured using the 24-hour urea-creatinine clearance method. Serum concentrations of cystatin C were determined. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the two published equations of Hoek and colleagues, and Yang and colleagues. GFR was also estimated from serum creatinine using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.
Patients (age range 18-86 years) were on CAPD for a median of 24 months. Average serum concentrations of cystatin C was 5 ± 1.2 mg/L. Average RRF was 0.7 ± 1.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2). All three methods significantly overestimated the measured RRF values (Hoek: 4 ± 1.4; Yang: 4.5 ± 1.5; 7.4 ± 4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Based on Bland-Altman plots, all three methods yielded poor agreement with RRF (p < 0.001 for all tests), with Hoek's equation providing the narrowest limits of agreement [mean difference (limits of agreement): 3.4 (2.9-3.9)] and CKD-EPI the widest [6.7 (5.9-7.5)]. Although the Hoek's method outperformed CKD-EPI, the within 30 and 50% accuracy rates were unsatisfactory (10.5 and19.7 %, respectively).
Cystatin C-derived equations outperform the CKD-EPI formula in approximating the RRF values. Yet, these methods still significantly overestimate the measured RRF and their routine application in clinical practice is not advised.
残余肾功能(RRF)在慢性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者的随访中起关键作用。现有的测量RRF的方法繁琐且很少使用,因此有人提出了基于胱抑素C的公式。
招募了76例成年CAPD患者。使用24小时尿素 - 肌酐清除率法测量RRF。测定血清胱抑素C浓度。使用Hoek及其同事以及Yang及其同事发表的两个公式估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)。还使用慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD - EPI)公式根据血清肌酐估算GFR。
患者年龄范围为18 - 86岁,接受CAPD治疗的中位时间为24个月。血清胱抑素C的平均浓度为5±1.2mg/L。平均RRF为0.7±1.6mL/min/1.73m²。所有三种方法均显著高估了测量的RRF值(Hoek公式:4±1.4;Yang公式:4.5±1.5;CKD - EPI公式:7.4±4mL/min/1.73m²)。根据Bland - Altman图,所有三种方法与RRF的一致性均较差(所有测试p<0.001),其中Hoek公式的一致性界限最窄[平均差异(一致性界限):3.4(2.9 - 3.9)],CKD - EPI公式最宽[6.7(5.9 - 7.5)]。尽管Hoek方法优于CKD - EPI公式,但其30%和50%的准确率仍不令人满意(分别为10.5%和19.7%)。
基于胱抑素C的公式在估算RRF值方面优于CKD - EPI公式。然而,这些方法仍显著高估了测量的RRF,不建议在临床实践中常规应用。