Gazard Billy, Frissa Souci, Nellums Laura, Hotopf Matthew, Hatch Stephani L
a Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London , Institute of Psychiatry , London , UK.
Ethn Health. 2015;20(6):564-93. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2014.961410. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
This study aimed to investigate the associations between migration status and health-related outcomes and to examine whether and how the effect of migration status changes when it is disaggregated by length of residence, first language, reason for migration and combined with ethnicity.
A total of 1698 adults were interviewed from 1076 randomly selected households in two South London boroughs. We described the socio-demographic and socio-economic differences between migrants and non-migrants and compared the prevalence of health-related outcomes by migration status, length of residence, first language, reason for migration and migration status within ethnic groups. Unadjusted models and models adjusted for socio-demographic and socio-economic indicators are presented.
Migrants were disadvantaged in terms of socio-economic status but few differences were found between migrant and non-migrants regarding health or health service use indicators; migration status was associated with decreased hazardous alcohol use, functional limitations due to poor mental health and not being registered with a general practitioner. Important differences emerged when migration status was disaggregated by length of residence in the UK, first language, reason for migration and intersected with ethnicity. The association between migration status and functional limitations due to poor mental health was only seen in White migrants, migrants whose first language was not English and migrants who had moved to the UK for work or a better life or for asylum or political reasons. There was no association between migration status and self-rated health overall, but Black African migrants had decreased odds for reporting poor health compared to their non-migrant counterparts [odds ratio = 0.15 (0.05-0.48), p < 0.01].
Disaggregating migration status by length of residence, first language and reason for migration as well as intersecting it with ethnicity leads to better understanding of the effect migration status has on health and health service use.
本研究旨在调查移民身份与健康相关结果之间的关联,并探讨当按居住时长、母语、移民原因进行分类以及与种族相结合时,移民身份的影响是否以及如何发生变化。
从伦敦南部两个行政区的1076个随机抽取的家庭中,共访谈了1698名成年人。我们描述了移民与非移民之间的社会人口统计学和社会经济差异,并比较了按移民身份、居住时长、母语、移民原因以及种族群体内的移民身份划分的健康相关结果的患病率。呈现了未调整模型以及针对社会人口统计学和社会经济指标进行调整后的模型。
移民在社会经济地位方面处于劣势,但在健康或医疗服务使用指标方面,移民与非移民之间几乎没有差异;移民身份与有害酒精使用减少、心理健康不佳导致的功能受限以及未在全科医生处注册有关。当按在英国的居住时长、母语、移民原因对移民身份进行分类并与种族交叉时,出现了重要差异。移民身份与心理健康不佳导致的功能受限之间的关联仅在白人移民、母语非英语的移民以及因工作、寻求更好生活、寻求庇护或政治原因移居英国的移民中可见。移民身份与总体自评健康之间没有关联,但与非移民相比,非洲黑人移民报告健康状况不佳的几率降低了[优势比 = 0.15(0.05 - 0.48),p < 0.01]。
按居住时长、母语和移民原因对移民身份进行分类,并与种族交叉,有助于更好地理解移民身份对健康和医疗服务使用的影响。