Chair of Vascular Neurology, Dementia and Cognitive Health of the Elderly, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany.
John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 Sep 16;8:291. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00291. eCollection 2014.
After an ischemic stroke, neural precursor cells (NPCs) proliferate within major germinal niches of the brain. Endogenous NPCs subsequently migrate toward the ischemic lesion where they promote tissue remodeling and neural repair. Unfortunately, this restorative process is generally insufficient and thus unable to support a full recovery of lost neurological functions. Supported by solid experimental and preclinical data, the transplantation of exogenous NPCs has emerged as a potential tool for stroke treatment. Transplanted NPCs are thought to act mainly via trophic and immune modulatory effects, thereby complementing the restorative responses initially executed by the endogenous NPC population. Recent studies have attempted to elucidate how the therapeutic properties of transplanted NPCs vary depending on the route of transplantation. Systemic NPC delivery leads to potent immune modulatory actions, which prevent secondary neuronal degeneration, reduces glial scar formation, diminishes oxidative stress and stabilizes blood-brain barrier integrity. On the contrary, local stem cell delivery allows for the accumulation of large numbers of transplanted NPCs in the brain, thus achieving high levels of locally available tissue trophic factors, which may better induce a strong endogenous NPC proliferative response. Herein we describe the diverse capabilities of exogenous (systemically vs. locally transplanted) NPCs in enhancing the endogenous neurogenic response after stroke, and how the route of transplantation may affect migration, survival, bystander effects and integration of the cellular graft. It is the authors' claim that understanding these aspects will be of pivotal importance in discerning how transplanted NPCs exert their therapeutic effects in stroke.
在缺血性中风后,神经前体细胞(NPC)在大脑的主要生殖部位增殖。内源性 NPC 随后迁移到缺血性损伤部位,在那里促进组织重塑和神经修复。不幸的是,这种修复过程通常是不够的,因此无法支持失去的神经功能的完全恢复。基于坚实的实验和临床前数据,外源性 NPC 的移植已成为中风治疗的一种潜在工具。移植的 NPC 被认为主要通过营养和免疫调节作用发挥作用,从而补充内源性 NPC 群体最初执行的修复反应。最近的研究试图阐明移植的 NPC 的治疗特性如何因移植途径而异。全身 NPC 递送会产生有效的免疫调节作用,从而防止继发性神经元变性、减少神经胶质瘢痕形成、减轻氧化应激并稳定血脑屏障完整性。相反,局部干细胞递送允许大量移植的 NPC 在大脑中积聚,从而实现高水平的局部可用组织营养因子,这可能更好地诱导强烈的内源性 NPC 增殖反应。本文描述了外源性 NPC(全身与局部移植)在增强中风后内源性神经发生反应方面的不同能力,以及移植途径如何影响细胞移植物的迁移、存活、旁观者效应和整合。作者声称,理解这些方面对于辨别移植的 NPC 如何在中风中发挥治疗作用至关重要。