Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 16;8:728. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00728. eCollection 2014.
The anterior insula (AI) maps visceral states and is active during emotional experiences, a functional confluence that is central to neurobiological accounts of feelings. Yet, it is unclear how AI activity correlates with feelings during social emotions, and whether this correlation may be influenced by culture, as studies correlating real-time AI activity with visceral states and feelings have focused on Western subjects feeling physical pain or basic disgust. Given psychological evidence that social-emotional feelings are cognitively constructed within cultural frames, we asked Chinese and American participants to report their feeling strength to admiration and compassion-inducing narratives during fMRI with simultaneous electrocardiogram recording. Trial-by-trial, cardiac arousal and feeling strength correlated with ventral and dorsal AI activity bilaterally but predicted different variance, suggesting that interoception and social-emotional feeling construction are concurrent but dissociable AI functions. Further, although the variance that correlated with cardiac arousal did not show cultural effects, the variance that correlated with feelings did. Feeling strength was especially associated with ventral AI activity (the autonomic modulatory sector) in the Chinese group but with dorsal AI activity (the visceral-somatosensory/cognitive sector) in an American group not of Asian descent. This cultural group difference held after controlling for posterior insula (PI) activity and was replicated. A bi-cultural East-Asian American group showed intermediate results. The findings help elucidate how the AI supports feelings and suggest that previous reports that dorsal AI activation reflects feeling strength are culture related. More broadly, the results suggest that the brain's ability to construct conscious experiences of social emotion is less closely tied to visceral processes than neurobiological models predict and at least partly open to cultural influence and learning.
前脑岛(AI)映射内脏状态,并在情绪体验中活跃,这种功能上的融合是神经生物学情感解释的核心。然而,目前尚不清楚 AI 活动如何与社交情绪中的感觉相关,以及这种相关性是否可能受到文化的影响,因为将实时 AI 活动与内脏状态和感觉相关联的研究主要集中在感受身体疼痛或基本厌恶的西方受试者上。鉴于心理证据表明,社会情感感受是在文化框架内认知构建的,我们要求中国和美国的参与者在 fMRI 期间报告他们对引起钦佩和同情的叙事的感觉强度,并同时进行心电图记录。逐次试验,心脏兴奋度和感觉强度与双侧腹侧和背侧 AI 活动相关,但预测的方差不同,这表明内感受和社会情感感受的构建是并发但可分离的 AI 功能。此外,尽管与心脏兴奋度相关的方差没有表现出文化效应,但与感觉相关的方差确实存在。在中国组中,感觉强度与 AI 的腹侧部分(自主调节区)特别相关,但在美国组中,感觉强度与 AI 的背侧部分(内脏感觉/躯体感觉/认知区)相关,而该美国组并非亚裔。在控制了后脑岛(PI)活动后,这种文化群体差异仍然存在,并得到了复制。具有双文化背景的东亚裔美国人组表现出中间结果。这些发现有助于阐明 AI 如何支持感觉,并表明先前关于背侧 AI 激活反映感觉强度的报告与文化有关。更广泛地说,这些结果表明,大脑构建社会情感意识体验的能力与神经生物学模型预测的内脏过程的联系不如以前认为的那么紧密,至少部分受到文化影响和学习的影响。