Suppr超能文献

在接受血液停搏液体外循环心脏手术的患者中,采用计算机算法进行围手术期血糖控制与传统血糖控制的比较。

Perioperative glycemic control with a computerized algorithm versus conventional glycemic control in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with blood cardioplegia.

作者信息

Punke Mark Andree, Goepfert Matthias S, Kluge Stefan, Reichenspurner Hermann, Goetz Alwin E, Reuter Daniel A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiologyy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiologyy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):1273-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.04.017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In critical illness, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia seem to influence outcome. While hypoglycemia can lead to organ dysfunction, hyperglycemia can lead to surgical site infections (SSI). In cardiac surgery, the use of blood cardioplegia is associated with high blood glucose levels. A computer-based algorithm (CBA) for guiding insulin towards normoglycemia might be beneficial. The authors' primary study end-point was the duration in a predefined blood glucose target range of 80 mg/dL to 150 mg/dL. Patients with conventional therapy served as controls.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-five patients.

INTERVENTIONS

The start of therapy was the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass. Group A: Therapy with CBA and measurement of blood glucose every 30 minutes. Group B: Measurement of blood glucose every 15 minutes using the identical CBA. Group C: Conventional therapy using a fixed insulin dosing scheme. End of therapy was defined as discharge from ICU.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Glucose administration during cardioplegia did not differ between groups (A: 33 ± 12 g; B: 32 ± 12 g; C: 38 ± 20 g). Glucose levels in groups A and B stayed significantly longer in the target interval compared with group C (A: 75 ± 20%; B: 72 ± 19%; C: 50 ± 34%, p < 0.01 n = 25, respectively). There were no significant differences regarding ICU stay and SSI rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Early computer-based insulin therapy allows practitioners to better achieve normoglycemia in patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with the use of blood cardioplegia.

摘要

目的

在危重病中,低血糖和高血糖似乎会影响预后。低血糖可导致器官功能障碍,而高血糖可导致手术部位感染(SSI)。在心脏手术中,使用血液停搏液与高血糖水平相关。一种用于指导胰岛素治疗以实现血糖正常化的计算机算法(CBA)可能有益。作者的主要研究终点是在80mg/dL至150mg/dL的预定义血糖目标范围内的持续时间。采用传统疗法的患者作为对照。

设计

前瞻性随机试验。

地点

大学医院。

参与者

75名患者。

干预措施

治疗开始于体外循环开始时。A组:采用CBA治疗,每30分钟测量一次血糖。B组:使用相同的CBA每15分钟测量一次血糖。C组:采用固定胰岛素给药方案的传统疗法。治疗结束定义为从重症监护病房出院。

测量与主要结果

停搏液期间的葡萄糖给药量在各组之间无差异(A组:33±12g;B组:32±12g;C组:38±20g)。与C组相比,A组和B组的血糖水平在目标区间内停留的时间明显更长(A组:75±20%;B组:72±19%;C组:50±34%,p<0.01,n分别为25)。在重症监护病房住院时间和手术部位感染率方面无显著差异。

结论

早期基于计算机的胰岛素治疗可使从业者在使用血液停搏液的心脏大手术患者中更好地实现血糖正常化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验