Suppr超能文献

药学专业的创新程度够吗?:运用名义群体技术满足澳大利亚慢性病患者及其护理人员的需求。

Is the pharmacy profession innovative enough?: meeting the needs of Australian residents with chronic conditions and their carers using the nominal group technique.

作者信息

McMillan Sara S, Sav Adem, Kelly Fiona, King Michelle A, Whitty Jennifer A, Wheeler Amanda J

机构信息

School of Human Services and Social Work, Population and Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, QLD 4131, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 4;14:476. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-476.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community pharmacies are ideally located as a source of support for people with chronic conditions. Yet, we have limited insight into what innovative pharmacy services would support this consumer group to manage their condition/s. The aim of this study was to identify what innovations people with chronic conditions and their carers want from their ideal community pharmacy, and compare with what pharmacists and pharmacy support staff think consumers want.

METHODS

We elicited ideas using the nominal group technique. Participants included people with chronic conditions, unpaid carers, pharmacists and pharmacy support staff, in four regions of Australia. Themes were identified via thematic analysis using the constant comparison method.

RESULTS

Fifteen consumer/carer, four pharmacist and two pharmacy support staff groups were conducted. Two overarching themes were identified: extended scope of practice for the pharmacist and new or improved pharmacy services. The most innovative role for Australian pharmacists was medication continuance, within a limited time-frame. Consumers and carers wanted improved access to pharmacists, but this did not necessarily align with a faster or automated dispensing service. Other ideas included streamlined access to prescriptions via medication reminders, electronic prescriptions and a chronic illness card.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further support for extending the pharmacist's role in medication continuance, particularly as it represents the consumer's voice. How this is done, or the methods used, needs to optimise patient safety. A range of innovative strategies were proposed and Australian community pharmacies should advocate for and implement innovative approaches to improve access and ensure continuity of care.

摘要

背景

社区药房地理位置优越,可为慢性病患者提供支持。然而,对于哪些创新药房服务能帮助这一消费群体管理自身病情,我们了解有限。本研究旨在确定慢性病患者及其护理人员希望从理想的社区药房获得哪些创新服务,并与药剂师和药房支持人员对消费者需求的看法进行比较。

方法

我们采用名义群体技术征集意见。参与者包括澳大利亚四个地区的慢性病患者、无薪护理人员、药剂师和药房支持人员。通过使用持续比较法的主题分析确定主题。

结果

开展了15个消费者/护理人员、4个药剂师和2个药房支持人员小组的讨论。确定了两个总体主题:药剂师扩大执业范围以及新的或改进的药房服务。澳大利亚药剂师最具创新性的角色是在有限时间内进行药物续方。消费者和护理人员希望能更方便地接触药剂师,但这不一定与更快或自动化的配药服务一致。其他想法包括通过用药提醒、电子处方和慢性病卡简化处方获取流程。

结论

本研究为扩大药剂师在药物续方方面的作用提供了进一步支持,尤其是因为这代表了消费者的声音。如何实现这一点或采用何种方法,需要优化患者安全。提出了一系列创新策略,澳大利亚社区药房应倡导并实施创新方法,以改善获取途径并确保护理的连续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5271/4282516/269e548ac38b/12913_2014_3547_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验