Levitin Dmitri
Trinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, UK.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2015 Oct;70(4):549-87. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jru027. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
This article examines an important new manuscript discovery: a set of lectures delivered at the Society of Apothecaries in 1634 by four members of the Society. No evidence of the intellectual and methodological assumptions of the apothecaries in this period has previously been known; the article contextualizes the lectures, and identifies the authors-a prominent group of apothecaries centered on the controversial John Buggs and the botanist Thomas Johnson. It then proceeds to discuss the contents of the lectures, which consist, to a remarkable extent, of reflections on the nature of physic and pharmacy inspired by the works of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century medical humanists. The apothecaries used the resources of medical humanism to raise the status of pharmacy as a medical discipline, and to argue for the proficiency of the apothecary as a fully fledged physician. Moreover, they emphasized the role of operative arts and used the rhetoric of "experiment" and "experience" in ways that might seem, on first impression, to foreshadow the "new science" that would soon emerge in England. As such, the lectures allow us to make not only some major revisions to existing accounts of the apothecary-physician relationship and the intellectual assumptions behind it, but also to some prominent recent literature in the social history of science and the history of the concept of "experimental philosophy."
1634年由药剂师协会的四名成员在该协会发表的一系列讲座。此前,关于这一时期药剂师的知识和方法论假设尚无证据可寻;本文将这些讲座置于具体情境中,并确定了作者——一个以有争议的约翰·巴格斯和植物学家托马斯·约翰逊为核心的杰出药剂师群体。接着,文章开始讨论讲座的内容,这些内容在很大程度上是对16世纪和17世纪医学人文主义者作品所启发的医学和药学本质的思考。药剂师们利用医学人文主义的资源来提升药学作为一门医学学科的地位,并主张药剂师作为一名成熟医生的专业能力。此外,他们强调了实用技艺的作用,并以乍一看似乎预示着即将在英国出现的“新科学”的方式运用了“实验”和“经验”的言辞。因此,这些讲座不仅让我们对药剂师与医生关系的现有描述及其背后的知识假设进行了一些重大修订,也让我们对科学社会史和“实验哲学”概念史的一些近期重要文献进行了修订。