Rosanowski S M, Cogger N, Rogers C W, Stevenson M A
EpiCentre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Massey Equine, Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Jun;63(3):321-32. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12277. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
New Zealand has never experienced an equine influenza (EI) outbreak. The 2007 outbreak of EI in Australia showed that in a naïve population EI spreads rapidly and substantial efforts (in terms of movement restrictions, mass vaccination and post-vaccination surveillance) were required to achieve eradication. To control EI, it is essential that animal health authorities have well-defined strategies for containment, control and eradication in place before an incursion occurs. A spatially explicit stochastic simulation model, InterSpread Plus, was used to evaluate EI control strategies for the New Zealand situation. The control strategies considered were movement restrictions alone and movement restrictions in combination with one of three vaccination strategies beginning on day 14; suppressive, protective or targeted. The suppressive strategy involved vaccination in a 3 km radius around infected properties, while the protective strategy involved vaccination in a 7-10 km ring around infected properties. Targeted vaccination involved the vaccination of all breeding and racing properties within 20 km of an infected property. Simulations were carried out to determine the impact of timing of vaccination and earlier detection on the size of and duration of the outbreak. All three vaccination strategies implemented on day 14 resulted in between 1028 and 2161 fewer infected properties (P < 0.001), and an epidemic that was between 42 and 90 days shorter (P < 0.001) compared with movement restrictions alone. Any vaccination strategy implemented on day 7 resulted in fewer infected properties, compared with vaccination implemented on days 14 or 21. Overall, the suppressive vaccination strategy resulted in fewer infected properties. Our findings indicate that any vaccination strategy, if combined with complete movement restrictions could be effective for the control of EI, if an outbreak was to occur in New Zealand. If an outbreak were to occur, a simulation model has now been created to assist in decision-making using data from the actual outbreak.
新西兰从未经历过马流感(EI)疫情。2007年澳大利亚爆发的马流感表明,在易感人群中,马流感传播迅速,需要付出巨大努力(包括实施行动限制、大规模疫苗接种和接种后监测)才能实现根除。为了控制马流感,动物卫生当局必须在疫情入侵之前制定明确的遏制、控制和根除策略。一个空间明确的随机模拟模型InterSpread Plus被用于评估新西兰应对马流感的控制策略。所考虑的控制策略包括单独的行动限制,以及从第14天开始与三种疫苗接种策略之一相结合的行动限制;抑制性、保护性或针对性策略。抑制性策略包括在受感染养殖场周围3公里半径范围内进行疫苗接种,而保护性策略包括在受感染养殖场周围7 - 10公里的环形区域内进行疫苗接种。针对性疫苗接种包括对受感染养殖场20公里范围内的所有繁殖和赛马养殖场进行疫苗接种。进行模拟以确定疫苗接种时间和更早检测对疫情规模和持续时间的影响。与单独的行动限制相比,在第14天实施的所有三种疫苗接种策略都使受感染养殖场减少了1028至2161个(P < 0.001),疫情持续时间缩短了42至90天(P < 0.001)。与在第14天或第21天实施疫苗接种相比,在第7天实施的任何疫苗接种策略都导致受感染养殖场数量减少。总体而言,抑制性疫苗接种策略导致受感染养殖场数量减少。我们的研究结果表明,如果新西兰发生疫情,任何疫苗接种策略与完全的行动限制相结合都可能有效控制马流感。如果发生疫情,现在已经创建了一个模拟模型,以利用实际疫情数据协助决策。