Hasak Liudmila, Wujtewicz Maria, Owczuk Radosław
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;46(4):274-9. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0044.
Tracheal intubation is one of the strongest stimuli during general anaesthesia and may result in an insufficient depth of anaesthesia. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical evaluation of the depth of anaesthesia with an evaluation using entropy during inhalational and intravenous induction of general anaesthesia.
This study involved 60 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups, group E (etomidate induction) and group S (sevoflurane induction). The systolic arterial pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR), response entropy (RE), and state entropy (SE) were determined at the following seven measurement points: before anaesthesia induction, at the loss of consciousness (LOC) point, before tracheal intubation, immediately after intubation, and 2 min., 4 min. and 6 min. after tracheal intubation. An increase in HR and/or SAP of more than 20% and/or the occurrence of lacrimation and/or perspiration in response to tracheal intubation was considered a marker of inadequate anaesthesia in the clinical evaluation. The depth of anaesthesia was considered insufficient according to entropy monitoring if the RE and SE were above 60.
In clinical evaluation, insufficient anaesthesia in response to tracheal intubation was observed in all the patients in group E and in more than half of the patients in group S. At the same time, the majority of patients in both groups had entropy values that did not exceed the recommended value as an appropriate level of anaesthesia.
We found a discrepancy in the evaluation of the depth of anaesthesia based on clinical criteria compared with evaluations based on entropy values during both intravenous and inhalational induction of general anaesthesia.
气管插管是全身麻醉期间最强烈的刺激之一,可能导致麻醉深度不足。本研究的目的是比较全身麻醉吸入诱导和静脉诱导期间麻醉深度的临床评估与熵值评估。
本研究纳入60例接受全身麻醉下择期手术的患者。患者分为两组,E组(依托咪酯诱导)和S组(七氟醚诱导)。在以下七个测量点测定收缩压(SAP)、心率(HR)、反应熵(RE)和状态熵(SE):麻醉诱导前、意识消失(LOC)点、气管插管前、插管后即刻、气管插管后2分钟、4分钟和6分钟。在临床评估中,气管插管后HR和/或SAP升高超过20%和/或出现流泪和/或出汗被视为麻醉不足的标志。如果RE和SE高于60,则根据熵监测认为麻醉深度不足。
在临床评估中,E组所有患者和S组半数以上患者在气管插管时出现麻醉不足。同时,两组大多数患者的熵值均未超过作为适当麻醉水平的推荐值。
我们发现在全身麻醉静脉诱导和吸入诱导期间,基于临床标准对麻醉深度的评估与基于熵值的评估存在差异。