Styck Kara M, Watkins Marley W
1 University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, USA.
2 Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
J Atten Disord. 2017 Sep;21(11):921-928. doi: 10.1177/1087054714553052. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
To evaluate the structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV).
Confirmatory factor analyses were applied to a sample of 233 students diagnosed with ADHD by school multidisciplinary evaluation teams to evaluate the relative fit of the following competing models: (a) one factor, (b) two oblique verbal and nonverbal factors, (c) three oblique verbal, perceptual, and combined working memory/processing speed factors, (d) four oblique verbal, perceptual, working memory, and processing speed factors, (e) a higher-order model with four first-order factors, and (f) a bifactor model with four domain-specific factors.
A higher-order four-factor model fit the data best, which was composed of a general intelligence factor and four domain-specific factors that matched the four factors specified in the WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. Moreover, the general intelligence factor explained more than two times the total variance contributed by all four domain-specific factors combined.
Results substantiate previous research on the WISC-IV, indicating that the general intelligence factor contributes the most reliable information. Consequently, it is recommended that interpretation of the WISC-IV remain at the Full-Scale IQ score level.
评估韦氏儿童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV)的结构效度。
对由学校多学科评估团队诊断为注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的233名学生样本进行验证性因素分析,以评估以下竞争模型的相对拟合度:(a)单因素模型;(b)两个斜交的言语和非言语因素模型;(c)三个斜交的言语、知觉以及组合的工作记忆/加工速度因素模型;(d)四个斜交的言语、知觉、工作记忆和加工速度因素模型;(e)具有四个一阶因素的高阶模型;(f)具有四个特定领域因素的双因素模型。
一个高阶四因素模型对数据的拟合最佳,该模型由一个一般智力因素和四个特定领域因素组成,这四个特定领域因素与WISC-IV技术和解释手册中规定的四个因素相匹配。此外,一般智力因素所解释的总方差是所有四个特定领域因素所解释总方差之和的两倍多。
结果证实了先前关于WISC-IV的研究,表明一般智力因素贡献了最可靠的信息。因此,建议对WISC-IV的解释保持在全量表智商分数水平。