Antoniazza Sylvain, Kanitz Ricardo, Neuenschwander Samuel, Burri Reto, Gaigher Arnaud, Roulin Alexandre, Goudet Jérôme
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mol Ecol. 2014 Nov;23(22):5508-23. doi: 10.1111/mec.12957. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Gradients of variation--or clines--have always intrigued biologists. Classically, they have been interpreted as the outcomes of antagonistic interactions between selection and gene flow. Alternatively, clines may also establish neutrally with isolation by distance (IBD) or secondary contact between previously isolated populations. The relative importance of natural selection and these two neutral processes in the establishment of clinal variation can be tested by comparing genetic differentiation at neutral genetic markers and at the studied trait. A third neutral process, surfing of a newly arisen mutation during the colonization of a new habitat, is more difficult to test. Here, we designed a spatially explicit approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) simulation framework to evaluate whether the strong cline in the genetically based reddish coloration observed in the European barn owl (Tyto alba) arose as a by-product of a range expansion or whether selection has to be invoked to explain this colour cline, for which we have previously ruled out the actions of IBD or secondary contact. Using ABC simulations and genetic data on 390 individuals from 20 locations genotyped at 22 microsatellites loci, we first determined how barn owls colonized Europe after the last glaciation. Using these results in new simulations on the evolution of the colour phenotype, and assuming various genetic architectures for the colour trait, we demonstrate that the observed colour cline cannot be due to the surfing of a neutral mutation. Taking advantage of spatially explicit ABC, which proved to be a powerful method to disentangle the respective roles of selection and drift in range expansions, we conclude that the formation of the colour cline observed in the barn owl must be due to natural selection.
变异梯度——或称渐变群——一直吸引着生物学家。传统上,它们被解释为选择与基因流之间拮抗相互作用的结果。另外,渐变群也可能通过距离隔离(IBD)或先前隔离种群之间的二次接触而中性地建立。通过比较中性遗传标记和所研究性状的遗传分化,可以检验自然选择和这两个中性过程在渐变变异形成中的相对重要性。第三个中性过程,即新出现的突变在新栖息地定殖过程中的漂变,更难检验。在这里,我们设计了一个空间明确的近似贝叶斯计算(ABC)模拟框架,以评估在欧洲仓鸮(Tyto alba)中观察到的基于遗传的微红颜色的强烈渐变群是作为范围扩张的副产品出现的,还是必须调用选择来解释这种颜色渐变群,此前我们已经排除了IBD或二次接触的作用。利用ABC模拟和来自20个地点的390个个体在22个微卫星位点进行基因分型的遗传数据,我们首先确定了仓鸮在末次冰期后如何在欧洲定殖。将这些结果用于颜色表型进化的新模拟中,并假设颜色性状有各种遗传结构,我们证明观察到的颜色渐变群不可能是由于中性突变的漂变。利用空间明确的ABC,事实证明这是一种强大的方法来区分选择和漂变在范围扩张中的各自作用,我们得出结论,仓鸮中观察到的颜色渐变群的形成一定是由于自然选择。