Pullicino Patrick M, Qian Min, Sacco Ralph L, Freudenberger Ron, Graham Susan, Teerlink John R, Mann Douglas, Di Tullio Marco R, Ponikowski Piotr, Lok Dirk J, Anker Stefan D, Lip Gregory Y H, Estol Conrado J, Levin Bruce, Mohr Jay P, Thompson John L P, Homma Shunichi
University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;38(3):176-81. doi: 10.1159/000365502. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
WARCEF randomized 2,305 patients in sinus rhythm with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% to warfarin (INR 2.0-3.5) or aspirin 325 mg. Warfarin reduced the incident ischemic stroke (IIS) hazard rate by 48% over aspirin in a secondary analysis. The IIS rate in heart failure (HF) is too low to warrant routine anticoagulation but epidemiologic studies show that prior stroke increases the stroke risk in HF. In this study, we explore IIS rates in WARCEF patients with and without baseline stroke to look for risk factors for IIS and determine if a subgroup with an IIS rate high enough to give a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction can be identified.
We compared potential stroke risk factors between patients with baseline stroke and those without using the exact conditional score test for Poisson variables. We looked for risk factors for IIS, by comparing IIS rates between different risk factors. For EF we tried cut-off points of 10, 15 and 20%. The cut-off point 15% was used as it was the highest EF that was associated with a significant increase in IIS rate. IIS and EF strata were balanced as to warfarin/aspirin assignment by the stratified randomized design. A multiple Poisson regression examined the simultaneous effects of all risk factors on IIS rate. IIS rates per hundred patient years (/100 PY) were calculated in patient groups with significant risk factors. Missing values were assigned the modal value.
Twenty of 248 (8.1%) patients with baseline stroke and 64 of 2,048 (3.1%) without had IIS. IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke (2.37/100 PY) was greater than patients without (0.89/100 PY) (rate ratio 2.68, p < 0.001). Fourteen of 219 (6.4%) patients with ejection fraction (EF) <15% and 70 of 2,079 (3.4%) with EF ≥ 15% had IIS. In the multiple regression analysis stroke at baseline (p < 0.001) and EF <15% vs. ≥ 15% (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of IIS. IIS rate was 2.04/100 PY in patients with EF <15% and 0.95/100 PY in patients with EF ≥ 15% (p = 0.009). IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke and reduced EF was 5.88/100 PY with EF <15% decreasing to 2.62/100 PY with EF <30%.
In a WARCEF exploratory analysis, prior stroke and EF <15% were risk factors for IIS. Further research is needed to determine if a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction is obtainable with warfarin in HF patients with prior stroke and reduced EF.
WARCEF研究将2305例射血分数(EF)≤35%的窦性心律患者随机分为华法林组(国际标准化比值[INR]为2.0 - 3.5)或阿司匹林325 mg组。在一项二次分析中,华法林组的缺血性卒中(IIS)发生率较阿司匹林组降低了48%。心力衰竭(HF)患者的IIS发生率过低,无需常规抗凝治疗,但流行病学研究表明,既往有卒中史会增加HF患者的卒中风险。在本研究中,我们探讨了WARCEF研究中有无基线卒中患者的IIS发生率,以寻找IIS的危险因素,并确定是否能识别出一个IIS发生率高到足以实现具有临床意义的卒中风险降低的亚组。
我们使用针对泊松变量的精确条件评分检验,比较了有基线卒中患者和无基线卒中患者之间潜在的卒中危险因素。通过比较不同危险因素之间的IIS发生率,寻找IIS的危险因素。对于EF,我们尝试了10%、15%和20%的截断点。使用15%作为截断点,因为这是与IIS发生率显著增加相关的最高EF值。根据分层随机设计,IIS和EF分层在华法林/阿司匹林分配方面是平衡的。多元泊松回归分析了所有危险因素对IIS发生率的同时影响。在具有显著危险因素的患者组中计算每100患者年的IIS发生率(/100 PY)。缺失值被赋予众数。
248例(8.1%)有基线卒中的患者中有20例发生IIS,2048例(3.1%)无基线卒中的患者中有64例发生IIS。有基线卒中患者的IIS发生率(2.37/100 PY)高于无基线卒中患者(0.89/100 PY)(发生率比值为2.68,p < 0.001)。219例射血分数(EF)<15%的患者中有14例(6.4%)发生IIS,2079例EF≥15%的患者中有70例(3.4%)发生IIS。在多元回归分析中,基线卒中(p < 0.001)和EF<15%与≥15%相比(p = 0.005)仍然是IIS的显著预测因素。EF<15%的患者IIS发生率为2.04/100 PY,EF≥15%的患者IIS发生率为0.95/100 PY(p = 0.009)。有基线卒中且EF降低的患者中,EF<15%时IIS发生率为5.88/100 PY,EF<30%时降至2.62/100 PY。
在WARCEF探索性分析中,既往卒中史和EF<15%是IIS的危险因素。需要进一步研究以确定对于既往有卒中史且EF降低的HF患者,使用华法林是否能实现具有临床意义的卒中风险降低。