Reuber M, Micoulaud-Franchi J-A, Gülich E, Bartolomei F, McGonigal A
Academic neurology unit, university of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, Royaume-Uni.
Solaris, pôle de psychiatrie universitaire, hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; UMR CNRS 7291, laboratoire de neurosciences cognitives (LNC), 31 Aix-Marseille université, site Saint-Charles, 3, place Victor-Hugo, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2014 Oct;44(4):375-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
The aetiology of "psychogenic" non-epileptic seizures (NES) remains poorly understood and the differentiation of NES from epilepsy can be a difficult. In the first part of this review article we focus on recent insights into the neurobiological underpinnings of NES. We summarise a number of studies demonstrating the importance of abnormalities of emotion regulation in patients with NES. Evidence for abnormal emotion regulation comes from both self-report and experimental studies of pre-conscious cognitive processes. These studies show that NES are not the only manifestation of abnormal mental processing in these patients and that excessive social threat avoidance and emotional dysregulation are also evident between seizures and may therefore contribute to disability beyond the seizures themselves. In the second part of this review, we describe the findings of a number of studies, which have examined differences between the communication behaviour of patients with NES and those with epilepsy. We argue, that, whilst these studies initially aimed to help clinicians with the differential diagnosis of NES and epilepsy, close sociolinguistic analysis of patient's talk can also provide clues about the aetiology of NES. We conclude that the interaction of patient with NES with the doctor can be interpreted as a manifestation of avoidance and a demonstration of helplessness perhaps intended to secure active support from the doctor. In the third part of this review, we suggest that a close reading of a transcript of the interaction between a patient with NES and her doctor (and perhaps attentive listening to how patients' talk about themselves and their disorder) can yield clues to the causes of NES in individual cases.
“心因性”非癫痫性发作(NES)的病因仍未得到充分理解,将NES与癫痫区分开来可能很困难。在这篇综述文章的第一部分,我们聚焦于对NES神经生物学基础的最新见解。我们总结了一些研究,这些研究证明了NES患者情绪调节异常的重要性。情绪调节异常的证据来自于对前意识认知过程的自我报告和实验研究。这些研究表明,NES并非这些患者异常心理加工的唯一表现,在发作间期过度的社交威胁回避和情绪失调也很明显,因此可能导致除发作本身之外的功能障碍。在这篇综述的第二部分,我们描述了一些研究的结果,这些研究考察了NES患者与癫痫患者沟通行为的差异。我们认为,虽然这些研究最初旨在帮助临床医生对NES和癫痫进行鉴别诊断,但对患者谈话进行细致的社会语言学分析也可以提供有关NES病因的线索。我们得出结论,NES患者与医生的互动可以被解释为一种回避的表现,以及一种无助的展示,这可能是为了获得医生的积极支持。在这篇综述的第三部分,我们建议仔细阅读NES患者与其医生互动的文字记录(或许还要留意倾听患者如何谈论自己及其病症),可以为个别病例中NES的病因提供线索。