Chi Angela C, Neville Brad W
Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA,
Head Neck Pathol. 2015 Jun;9(2):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s12105-014-0572-2. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate surface papillary epithelial hyperplasia, a microscopic finding that corresponds to the clinical finding of rough or stippled mucosa, as a predictor of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA). We conducted a retrospective review of minor salivary gland neoplasms submitted to our biopsy service from 1991 to 2013. Our review was limited to lesions involving the oral cavity/soft palate with the following diagnoses: PLGA, pleomorphic adenoma (PA), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). A total of 202 minor salivary gland neoplasms were included in the study. Among cases in which surface epithelium was present for evaluation (n = 112), surface papillary epithelial hyperplasia was evident in 30 % of PLGA and 1 % of non-PLGA (i.e., MEC, ACC, PA). The greater frequency of surface papillary epithelial hyperplasia in the PLGA versus non-PLGA cases and in the benign versus malignant cases was significant (p = .0001 and p = .041, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of papillary epithelial hyperplasia for PLGA were 30 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 11.97-54.27 %) and 99 % (95 % CI 94-99.82 %), respectively. The clinical presentation of PLGA appeared relatively nonspecific, with all analyzed tumor types exhibiting a predilection for females, middle-aged to older adults, palatal location, pink/tan/normal color, and firm consistency. In conclusion, papillary epithelial hyperplasia was evident in only a minority of PLGA. However, when present within the context of a palatal salivary gland neoplasm, it appears to indicate a high probability of PLGA. Accordingly, rough mucosa may be a useful clinical pearl for identification of PLGA.
本研究的目的是评估表面乳头样上皮增生,这一微观表现对应于黏膜粗糙或呈颗粒状的临床发现,作为多形性低度恶性腺癌(PLGA)的预测指标。我们对1991年至2013年提交至我们活检服务部门的小涎腺肿瘤进行了回顾性研究。我们的研究仅限于涉及口腔/软腭且有以下诊断的病变:PLGA、多形性腺瘤(PA)、黏液表皮样癌(MEC)和腺样囊性癌(ACC)。本研究共纳入202例小涎腺肿瘤。在有表面上皮可供评估的病例中(n = 112),30%的PLGA病例存在表面乳头样上皮增生,而非PLGA(即MEC、ACC、PA)病例中这一比例为1%。PLGA病例中表面乳头样上皮增生的频率高于非PLGA病例,以及良性病例与恶性病例相比,差异均具有统计学意义(分别为p = .0001和p = .041)。乳头样上皮增生对PLGA的敏感性和特异性分别为30%(95%置信区间(CI)11.97 - 54.27%)和99%(95%CI 94 - 99.82%)。PLGA的临床表现相对不具特异性,所有分析的肿瘤类型均表现出对女性、中年至老年成年人、腭部位置、粉红色/棕褐色/正常颜色以及质地坚硬的偏好。总之,仅少数PLGA病例存在乳头样上皮增生。然而,当在腭部涎腺肿瘤背景下出现时,它似乎提示PLGA的可能性很高。因此,粗糙的黏膜可能是识别PLGA的一个有用的临床线索。