Burleson Elizabeth
Pace Law School, United States.
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2012 Winter;22(2):289-348.
This Article argues that filling the energy governance gaps regarding unconventional natural gas can best be accomplished through collaborative governance that is genuinely adaptive and cooperative. Through cooperative federalism, combined with procedural rights for inclusive, innovative decision-making, state and non-state actors should design and implement the requisite safeguards before further natural gas development advances. Hydraulic fracturing provisions are strikingly fragmented and have sparked a fierce debate about chemical disclosure, radioactive wastewater disposal, and greenhouse gas emissions. United States natural gas production may stunt the direction and intensity of renewable energy by up to two decades and will not provide a bridge to a sound energy policy if it "erode[s] efforts to prepare a landing at the other end of the bridge." Unconventional natural gas extraction need not become a transition to a new addiction. This Article analyzes how cooperative federalism and inclusive decision-making can provide legitimacy and transparency when balancing property rights against police powers to regulate natural gas production.
本文认为,填补非常规天然气能源治理方面的空白,最好通过真正具有适应性和合作性的协同治理来实现。通过合作联邦制,结合包容性、创新性决策的程序权利,在进一步推进天然气开发之前,国家和非国家行为体应设计并实施必要的保障措施。水力压裂相关规定极为分散,引发了关于化学品披露、放射性废水处理和温室气体排放的激烈辩论。美国的天然气生产可能会使可再生能源的发展方向和强度停滞长达二十年,并且如果它“削弱了在桥的另一端实现平稳过渡的努力”,就无法为健全的能源政策搭建桥梁。非常规天然气开采不一定会演变成对新事物的依赖。本文分析了合作联邦制和包容性决策如何在平衡产权与监管天然气生产的警察权力时提供合法性和透明度。