Winickoff Jonathan P, Nabi-Burza Emara, Chang Yuchiao, Regan Susan, Drehmer Jeremy, Finch Stacia, Wasserman Richard, Ossip Deborah, Hipple Bethany, Woo Heide, Klein Jonathan, Rigotti Nancy A
Center for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Policy, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; AAP Richmond Center of Excellence, and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, and
Center for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Policy, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, and.
Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):933-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0639. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
To determine whether an evidence-based pediatric outpatient intervention for parents who smoke persisted after initial implementation.
A cluster randomized controlled trial of 20 pediatric practices in 16 states that received either Clinical and Community Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure (CEASE) intervention or usual care. The intervention provided practices with training to provide evidence-based assistance to parents who smoke. The primary outcome, assessed by the 12-month follow-up telephone survey with parents, was provision of meaningful tobacco control assistance, defined as discussing various strategies to quit smoking, discussing smoking cessation medication, or recommending the use of the state quitline after initial enrollment visit. We also assessed parental quit rates at 12 months, determined by self-report and biochemical verification.
Practices' rates of providing any meaningful tobacco control assistance (55% vs 19%), discussing various strategies to quit smoking (25% vs 10%), discussing cessation medication (41% vs 11%), and recommending the use of the quitline (37% vs 9%) were all significantly higher in the intervention than in the control groups, respectively (P < .0001 for each), during the 12-month postintervention implementation. Receiving any assistance was associated with a cotinine-confirmed quitting adjusted odds ratio of 1.89 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-3.19). After controlling for demographic and behavioral factors, the adjusted odds ratio for cotinine-confirmed quitting in intervention versus control practices was 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.78).
Intervention practices had higher rates of delivering tobacco control assistance than usual care practices over the 1-year follow-up period. Parents who received any assistance were more likely to quit smoking; however, parents' likelihood of quitting smoking was not statistically different between the intervention and control groups. Maximizing parental quit rates will require more complete systems-level integration and adjunctive cessation strategies.
确定针对吸烟父母的循证儿科门诊干预措施在初始实施后是否持续有效。
在16个州的20家儿科诊所进行整群随机对照试验,这些诊所分别接受了“临床与社区抵制二手烟暴露努力”(CEASE)干预或常规护理。该干预为诊所提供培训,以便为吸烟父母提供循证帮助。通过对父母进行12个月的随访电话调查评估的主要结局是提供有意义的烟草控制帮助,定义为在初次登记就诊后讨论各种戒烟策略、讨论戒烟药物或推荐使用该州的戒烟热线。我们还通过自我报告和生化验证评估了12个月时父母的戒烟率。
在干预后12个月的实施期间,干预组在提供任何有意义的烟草控制帮助(55%对19%)、讨论各种戒烟策略(25%对10%)、讨论戒烟药物(41%对11%)以及推荐使用戒烟热线(37%对9%)方面的比例均显著高于对照组(每项P<0.0001)。接受任何帮助与可替宁确认戒烟的调整优势比为1.89(95%置信区间:1.13 - 3.19)相关。在控制了人口统计学和行为因素后,干预组与对照组诊所中可替宁确认戒烟的调整优势比为1.07(95%置信区间:0.64 - 1.78)。
在1年的随访期内,干预诊所提供烟草控制帮助的比例高于常规护理诊所。接受任何帮助的父母更有可能戒烟;然而,干预组和对照组父母的戒烟可能性在统计学上没有差异。要使父母的戒烟率最大化,需要更全面的系统层面整合和辅助戒烟策略。