Haeny Angela M
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri - Columbia.
Ethics Behav. 2014 Jul 1;24(4):265-278. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.860030.
Previous literature has documented the general issues psychologists often face while balancing their personal and professional lives. The struggle stems from attempting to satisfy the need to maintain a life outside of work while having the professional obligation to follow the American Psychological Association's (APA's) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Ethics Code) to prevent their personal lives from interfering with their professional roles and relationships. The present paper analyzes the subject of psychologists taking a public position on controversial public issues. Although the APA Ethics Code does not restrict how psychologists conduct themselves during their personal time, taking a public stance on a controversial issue could potentially strain professional relationships and inadvertently reflect negatively on the profession. The present paper examines ethical issues that a) should be taken into account before psychologists take a public position on a controversial issue, and b) are in conflict with APA's Ethics Code or current research.
以往的文献记录了心理学家在平衡个人生活和职业生活时经常面临的普遍问题。这种挣扎源于既要满足维持工作之外生活的需求,又要履行职业义务,遵循美国心理学会(APA)的《心理学家伦理原则与行为准则》(《伦理准则》),以防止个人生活干扰其职业角色和人际关系。本文分析了心理学家在有争议的公共问题上采取公开立场这一主题。尽管《APA伦理准则》并未限制心理学家在个人时间的行为方式,但在有争议的问题上采取公开立场可能会使职业关系紧张,并无意中给该职业带来负面影响。本文探讨了两个伦理问题:a)心理学家在有争议的问题上采取公开立场之前应考虑的问题;b)与《APA伦理准则》或当前研究相冲突的问题。